Student attitudes toward pair programming

ABSTRACT

Students in four introductory programming classes who participated in a pair programming study had very positive attitudes toward pair programming: they liked it, thought that it was fun, would like to do it again, and believed that they learned more because they paired. Although the students as a whole had positive attitudes, the results were not consistent between instructors; in particular, the students in one of the courses were significantly less positive about pair programming. The implications of instructor-based differences in attitude are discussed.This paper also examines the relationship between student confidence and attitudes toward pair programming. The most confident students liked pairing the most, while the least confident students liked it the least. This finding contradicts results that have been reported elsewhere.

REFERENCES

• 1: P. Dalgaard. Introductory Statistics with R. Springer, New York, 2002.
• 2: B. Hanks. Distributed pair programming: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods -- XP/Agile Universe, number 3134 in LNCS, pages 81--91. Springer, 2004.
• 3: Brian F. Hanks , Charlie Mcdowell, Empirical studies of distributed pair programming, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 2005
• 4: Brian Hanks, Student performance in CS1 with distributed pair programming, Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 27-29, 2005, Caparica, Portugal
• 5: Brian Hanks , Charlie McDowell , David Draper , Milovan Krnjajic, Program quality with pair programming in CS1, Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 28-30, 2004, Leeds, United Kingdom
• 6: J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
• 7: Charlie McDowell , Brian Hanks , Linda Werner, Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom, Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 30-July 02, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece
• 8: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather E. Bullock , Julian Fernald, The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 9: Grigori Melnik , Frank Maurer, Perceptions of Agile Practices: A Student Survey, Proceedings of the Second XP Universe and First Agile Universe Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, p.241-250, August 04-07, 2002
• 10: R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2004. ISBN 3-900051-00-3.
• 11: S. Siegel and J. N. John Castellan. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, second edition, 1988.
• 12: Lynda Thomas , Mark Ratcliffe , Ann Robertson, Code warriors and code-a-phobes: a study in attitude and pair programming, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 13: Linda L. Werner , Brian Hanks , Charlie McDowell, Pair-programming helps female computer science students, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), v.4 n.1, p.4-es, March 2004 [doi>10.1145/1060071.1060075]
• 14: Laurie Williams , Robert Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 15: Laurie Williams , Robert R. Kessler , Ward Cunningham , Ron Jeffries, Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming, IEEE Software, v.17 n.4, p.19-25, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/52.854064]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Experimentation, Measurement

Keywords:
computer science education, empirical software engineering, instructor influence, pair programming, student attitudes, student confidence