ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Student activity in seminars: designing multi-functional assessment events
Full text PdfPdf (210 KB)
Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Assessment table of contents
Pages: 93 - 97  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-055-8
Also published in ...
Authors
Karin Axelsson  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Ulf Melin  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Tommy Wedlund  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1140124.1140151
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe assessment in seminars where high student activity is encouraged. The aim of our work has been to design assessment events that result in deep learning and high student activity, but still provide the teacher with a reliable basis for justice in examinations. We will discuss a course in electronic commerce where we have been working with two progressive seminars. Experiences from this attempt are discussed and analysed in the paper.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Biggs, J. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press, 2003.
 
2
Boud, D. Assessing and Learning: Contradictory or Complementary?, In Knight, P. (Ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Kogan Page, London, 1995, 35--48.
 
3
Eckerstein, J., Helm, A., and Kemlin, P. Generation.com. Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2002. {in Swedish}
 
4
Gibbs, G. Assessing Student Centered Courses. The Oxford Centre for Staff Development, 1995.
 
5
Kolb, D.A. Learning and Problem Solving - On Management and the Learning Process. In Kolb, D.A., Rubin, I.M. and McIntyre, J.M. (Eds.) Organizational Psychology - A Book of Readings. Second Edition, 1974, 27--42.
 
6
Lindroos, M. The Production of 'Girl' in an Educational Setting. Gender and Education, 1995, 7(2):143--155.
 
7
Marton, F., and Säljö, R. On Qualitative Differences in Learning. Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 46:4--11.
 
8
Oh, P.S. Discursive Roles of the Teacher during Class Sessions for Students Presenting their Science Investigations. International Journal of Science Education. 2005, 27(15):1825--1851.
 
9
Ramsden, P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. RoutledgeFalmer, London, 2003.
 
10
Silberman, M. Active Training: A Handbook of Techniques, Designs, Case Examples and Tips. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Karin Axelsson: colleagues
Ulf Melin: colleagues
Tommy Wedlund: colleagues