Creating a realistic context for team projects in HCI

ABSTRACT

Team projects are nowadays common practice in HCI education. This paper focuses on the role of clients and users in team projects in introductory HCI courses. In order to provide projects with a realistic context we invite people from industry to serve as clients for the student teams. Some of them have a professional interest in participating in our course and define a project themselves. Another way we make projects realistic is to have teams evaluate their designs with real users.We describe how we incorporate the role of clients and users in our courses and describe our experiences. One of the results of our evaluations is that most students find it very interesting and stimulating to work with a client on a 'real' project from industry.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alan Dix , Janet Finlay , Gregory Abowd , Russell Beale, Human-computer interaction, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997
• 2: B. Hartfield , Terry Winograd , John Bennett, Learning HCI design: mentoring project groups in a course on human-computer interaction, Proceedings of the twenty-third SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.246-251, March 05-06, 1992, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
• 3: Jonathan Lazar , Jenny Preece , Jean Gasen , Terry Winograd, New issues in teaching HCI: pinning a tail on a moving donkey, CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/506443.506551]
• 4: Timothy C. Lethbridge, What Knowledge Is Important to a Software Professional?, Computer, v.33 n.5, p.44-50, May 2000 [doi>10.1109/2.841783]
• 5: L. M. Leventhal , J. Barnes , J. Chao, Term project user interface specifications in a usability engineering course: challenges and suggestions, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 6: Judith S. Olson, The HCI program at the School of Information at the University of Michigan, interactions, v.12 n.5, September + October 2005 [doi>10.1145/1082369.1082389]
• 7: Robert Pastel, Integrating science and research in a HCI design course, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 8: Jennifer A. Polack-Wahl, Incorporating the client's role in a software engineering course, The proceedings of the thirtieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.73-77, March 24-28, 1999, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
• 9: Mary Beth Rosson , John M. Carroll , Con M. Rodi, Case studies for teaching usability engineering, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 10: Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., and Minocha, S. User Interface Design and Evaluation, Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
• 11: Mary Jane Willshire, A usability focus for an HCI project, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.17 n.2, p.50-58, December 2001
• 12: Terry Winograd , Scott Klemmer, HCI at Stanford University, interactions, v.12 n.5, September + October 2005 [doi>10.1145/1082369.1082388]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: User-centered design

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Information systems education; Computer science education

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
human-computer interaction, team projects, usability, user-centered design