ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reducing lecture and increasing student activity in large computer science courses
Full text PdfPdf (576 KB)
Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Innovation in the classroom table of contents
Pages: 3 - 7  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-055-8
Also published in ...
Author
Roy P. Pargas  Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1140124.1140129
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes how one instructor uses a web-based tool called MessageGrid in a laptop-enhanced computer science course to accomplish five goals: (1) to solicit questions from students regarding pre-lecture reading assignments, (2) to engage the students in classroom activity that supports the lecture material for the day, (3) to conduct short, frequent assessments of student comprehension, (4) to conduct exercises that encourage peer-learning, and (5) to use Ink-based software animations to supplement the lecture material for the day. We present MessageGrid and explain how the short lecture exercises (called lexes) help engage the students in class. We show how the assessment component of MessageGrid helps students know whether or not they learning the material as they should, and enables the instructor to identify students who are falling behind. We present four different ways of designing lexes. We end with conclusions and plans for future work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Crouch, Catherine H. and Mazur, E., "Peer-Instruction: Ten years of experience and results", American Journal of Physics, 69(9), September 1997, pp. 970--977
 
3
Culler, R., "DSInk: A Software Library for Developing Data Structures Applications for the Tablet PC", M.S. research paper, May 2005, Department of Computer Science, Clemson University
 
4
Nilson, L. and Weaver, B, "Laptops in class: What are they good for? What can you do with them?", In New Dimensions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2005, No. 101, Spring 2005, L.B. Nilson and B.E. Weaver, eds., pp. 3--13
 
5
Pargas, R.P., Levin, A.R. and Austin, J., "Work-In-Progress: Providing Interactivity in a Technology-Rich Classroom", Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, October 19-22, 2005, pp. F3D 13--14
 
6
Pargas, R.P., "Using MessageGrid to Promote Student Collaboration", Proceedings of IADIS Cognition and Exploratory Learning in a Digital Age 2005, Porto, Portugal, December 14-16, 2005, pp. 359--362
7
 
8
Pargas, R.P., "Facilitating a Course in Tablet PC Software Development", Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on the Impact of Pen-technology on Education, Purdue University, April 4-6, 2006 (to appear)
 
9
Pargas, R.P. and Weaver, K.A., "Laptops in Computer Science: Creating the 'Learning Studio'", New Dimensions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2005, No. 101, Spring 2005, L.B. Nilson and B.E. Weaver, eds., pp. 43--49
 
10
Prey, J.C., "Cooperative learning in an undergraduate computer science curriculum", Proceedings of the 1995 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 1995. pp. 3c2.11--3c2.14 vol.2
11
 
12
WACOM Graphire Tablets, http://www.wacom.com

CITED BY  8