Planning and improving global software development process using simulation

ABSTRACT

Global software development poses a number of challenges and difficulties as well as significant potential benefits. In order to be successful, companies need to adapt and improve their processes to support this kind of development. Strong project planning and management is also required. Software process simulation modeling has been used to address a variety of issues in software development projects ranging from strategic management, project planning and control, process improvement, to training and understanding. We believe that a hybrid simulation model combining system dynamics and discrete-event models is needed to effectively model global software development projects. In this paper, we describe such a model, and focus on the use of the model to support project planning and process improvement in global software development. Example questions/issues that can be addressed by our GSD model are provided, along with an illustrative application.

REFERENCES

• 1: Allen, T. J. Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1977.
• 2: Bass, M. and Paulish, D., Global Software Development Process Research at Siemens. in The 3rd International Workshop on Global Software Development, (Edinburgh, Scotland, 2004), 8--11.
• 3: Robert D. Battin , Ron Crocker , Joe Kreidler , K. Subramanian, Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.70-77, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914750]
• 4: Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 5: Carmel, E. Global Software Teams. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
• 6: Carmel, E. and Tija, P. Offshoring Information Technology: Sourcing and Outsourcing to a Global Workforce. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
• 7: Consortium, S. P. Measurement for Distributed Teams, Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, Virginia, 2002, 68.
• 8: Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
• 9: Gorton, I. and Motwani, S. Issues in Co-operative Software Engineering Using Globally Distributed Teams. Information and SoftwareTechnology, 38 (January. 1996), 647--655.
• 10: Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Linda, K. W. and Heyman, S. The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication style across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 4 (1996), 510--543.
• 11: James D. Herbsleb , Rebecca E. Grinter, Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.85-95, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302455]
• 12: James D. Herbsleb , Deependra Moitra, Guest Editors' Introduction: Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.16-20, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914732]
• 13: Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Oublications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001.
• 14: Jarvenpaa, S. L. Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 4 (1998).
• 15: Jennings, E. E. Routes to the Executive Suite. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
• 16: Capers Jones, Applied software measurement (2nd ed.): assuring productivity and quality, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Hightstown, NJ, 1996
• 17: Kellner, M. I., Madachy, R. J. and Raffo, D. M. Software Process Simulation Modeling: Why? What? How? Journal of Systems and Software, 46, 2/3 (April 15. 1999).
• 18: Robert E. Kraut , Lynn A. Streeter, Coordination in software development, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.3, p.69-81, March 1995 [doi>10.1145/203330.203345]
• 19: Norbjerg, J., Havn, E. C. and Bansler, J. P., Global Production: The Case of Offshore Programming. in Wirtschaftsinformatik '97, (Physica-Verlag, Berlin, 1997).
• 20: Pearce, W. B. Trust in interpersonal communication. Speech Monographs, 41 (August. 1974), 236--244.
• 21: Dewayne E. Perry , Nancy Staudenmayer , Lawrence G. Votta, People, Organizations, and Process Improvement, IEEE Software, v.11 n.4, p.36-45, July 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.300082]
• 22: Raffo, D. and Setamanit, S., A Simulation Model for Global Software Development Project. in The International Workshop on Software Process Simulation and Modeling, (St. Louis, MO, 2005).
• 23: David M. Raffo , Marc I. Kellner, Empirical analysis in software process simulation modeling, Journal of Systems and Software, v.53 n.1, p.31-41, July 15, 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00006-6]
• 24: Raffo, D. M., Vandeville, J. and Martin, R. Software Process Simulation to Achieve Higher CMM Levels. Journal of Systems and Software, 46, 2/3 (April 15. 1999).
• 25: Steiner, I. D. Models for Inferring Relationships Between Group Size and Potential Group Productivity. Journal of Behavioral Science, 5, 11 (1966), 273--283.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Cost estimation

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Software process models (e.g., CMM, ISO, PSP)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.3 Applications
      I.6.5 Model Development
      I.6.6 Simulation Output Analysis

General Terms:
Management, Measurement

Keywords:
distributed development, global software development, hybrid simulation model, software process simulation modeling