Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning object-oriented programming?

ABSTRACT

Computer science educators generally agree that abstract thinking is a crucial component for learning computer science in general and programming in particular. We report on a study to confirm the hypothesis that general abstraction ability has a positive impact on programming ability. Abstraction ability is operationalized as stages of cognitive development (for which validated tests exist). Programming ability is operationalized as grade in the final assessment of a model-based objects-first CS1. The validity of the operationalizations is discussed. Surprisingly, our study shows that there is no correlation between stage of cognitive development (abstraction ability) and final grade in CS1 (programming ability). Possible explanations are identified.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Adey, P and Shayer, M. Really raising standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement, Routledge, London, England, 1994.
	2	Carl Alphonce , Phil Ventura, Object orientation in CS1-CS2 by design, Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 24-28, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark
	3	Jens Bennedsen , Michael E. Caspersen, Programming in context: a model-first approach to CS1, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
	4	Jens Bennedsen , Michael E. Caspersen, An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course, Proceedings of the 2005 international workshop on Computing education research, p.155-163, October 01-02, 2005, Seattle, WA, USA [doi>10.1145/1089786.1089801]
	5	Bennedsen, J. & Caspersen, M. E. Assessing Process and Product -- A Practical Lab Exam for an Introductory Programming Course. Submitted for 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, USA, 2006.
	6	Susan Bergin , Ronan Reilly, Programming: factors that influence success, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
	7	Bond, T. B. Piaget and the Pendulum, Science and Education, 13, 2004, 389--399.
	8	Boyer, S. P., & Sedlacek, W. E. Non-Cognitive Predictors of Academic Success for International Students: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of College Student Development, 29, 1988, 218--223.
	9	Pat Byrne , Gerry Lyons, The effect of student attributes on success in programming, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.49-52, June 2001, Canterbury, United Kingdom
	10	Cafolla, R. Piagetian Formal Operations and other Cognitive Correlates of Achivement in Computer Programming, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 16(1), 1987-88, 45--55.
	11	Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1955) De la logique de l'enfant àà la logique de l'adolescent: Essai sur la construction des structures opératoires formelles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Translated by Anne Parsons and Stanley Milgram as The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures, New York: Basic Books, 1958.
	12	Iqbal, H. M. and Shayer, M. Accelerating the Development of Formal Thinking in Pakistan Secondary School Students: Achievement Effects and Professional Development Issues, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (3), 2000, 259--274.
	13	Barry L. Kurtz, Investigating the relationship between the development of abstract reasoning and performance in an introductory programming class, Proceedings of the eleventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.110-117, February 14-15, 1980, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
	14	R. R. Leeper , J. L. Silver, Predicting success in a first programming course, Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.147-150, February 11-12, 1982, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
	15	Nguyen, D. & Wong, S. OOP in Introductory CS: Better Students Through Abstraction, Proceedings of the fifth Workshop on Pedagogies and Tools for Assimilating Object-Oriented Concepts, OOPSLA 2001.
	16	Rachel Or-Bach , Ilana Lavy, Cognitive activities of abstraction in object orientation: an empirical study, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.36 n.2, June 2004 [doi>10.1145/1024338.1024378]
	17	Nathan Rountree , Janet Rountree , Anthony Robins, Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.34 n.4, December 2002 [doi>10.1145/820127.820182]
	18	Shayer, M. and Adey, P. Towards a Science of Science Teaching, Heinemann Educational Publishers, Oxford, England, 1981.
	19	Peter Sprague , Celia Schahczenski, Abstraction the key to CS1, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.17 n.3, p.211-218, February 2002
	20	Ting, S. R., & Robinson, T. L. First-Year Academic Success: A Prediction Combining Cognitive and Psychosocial Variables for Caucasian and African American Students, Journal of College Student Development, 39, 1998, 599--610.
	21	Philip R. Ventura, Jr. , Bina Ramamurthy, On the origins of programmers: identifying predictors of success for an objects first cs1, 2004
	22	Phil Ventura , Bina Ramamurthy, Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
	23	Ventura, P. R. Identifying Predictors of Success for an Objects-First CS1, Journal of Computer Science Education, 15 (3), 2005, 223--243.
	24	Wilson, B. C. A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences, Journal of Computer Science Education, 12 (1-2), 2002, 141--164.