ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Versatility and Unix semantics in namespace unification
Full text PdfPdf (318 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 1  (February 2006) table of contents
Pages: 74 - 105  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1553-3077
Authors
Charles P. Wright  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Jay Dave  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Puja Gupta  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Harikesavan Krishnan  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
David P. Quigley  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Erez Zadok  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Mohammad Nayyer Zubair  Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1138041.1138045
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Administrators often prefer to keep related sets of files in different locations or media, as it is easier to maintain them separately. Users, however, prefer to see all files in one location for convenience. One solution that accommodates both needs is virtual namespace unification---providing a merged view of several directories without physically merging them. For example, namespace unification can merge the contents of several CD-ROM images without unpacking them, merge binary directories from different packages, merge views from several file servers, and more. Namespace unification can also enable snapshotting by marking some data sources read-only and then utilizing copy-on-write for the read-only sources. For example, an OS image may be contained on a read-only CD-ROM image---and the user's configuration, data, and programs could be stored in a separate read-write directory. With copy-on-write unification, the user need not be concerned about the two disparate file systems.It is difficult to maintain Unix semantics while offering a versatile namespace unification system. Past efforts to provide such unification often compromised on the set of features provided or Unix compatibility---resulting in an incomplete solution that users could not use.We designed and implemented a versatile namespace unification system called Unionfs. Unionfs maintains Unix semantics while offering advanced namespace unification features: dynamic insertion and removal of namespaces at any point in the merged view, mixing read-only and read-write components, efficient in-kernel duplicate elimination, NFS interoperability, and more. Since releasing our Linux implementation, it has been used by thousands of users and over a dozen Linux distributions, which helped us discover and solve many practical problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AT&T Bell Laboratories. 1995. Plan 9---Programmer's Manual. AT&T Bell Laboratories.
 
2
Ellard, D. and Seltzer, M. 2003. NFS tricks and benchmarking traps. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Technical Conference, FREENIX Track (San Antonio, Tex.), 101--114.
 
3
Flouris, M. D. and Bilas, A. 2004. Clotho: Transparent data versioning at the block I/O level. In Proceedings of the 12th NASA Goddard, 21st IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST 2004). College Park, Md. 315--328.
 
4
Fraser, T., Badger, L., and Feldman, M. 1999. Hardening COTS software with generic software wrappers. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2--16.
 
5
Guy, R. G., Heidemann, J. S., Mak, W., Page Jr., T. W., Popek, G. J., and Rothmeier, D. 1990. Implementation of the Ficus replicated file system. In Proceedings of the Summer USENIX Technical Conference, 63--71.
6
 
7
Hendricks, D. 1990. A filesystem for software development. In Proceedings of the USENIX Summer Conference (Anaheim, Calif.), 333--340.
 
8
Hitz, D., Lau, J., and Malcolm, M. 1994. File system design for an NFS file server appliance. In Proceedings of the USENIX Winter Technical Conference (San Francisco, Calif.), 235--245.
 
9
Joukov, N., Wright, C. P., and Zadok, E. 2004. FSprof: An in-kernel file system operations profiler. Tech. Rep. FSL-04-06, Computer Science Department, Stony Brook University. www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/docs/aggregate_stats-tr/aggregate_stats.pdf.
 
10
Kamp, P. H. and Watson, R. N. M. 2000. Jails: Confining the omnipotent root. In Proceedings of the 2nd International System Administration and Networking Conference (SANE2000). Maastricht, The Netherlands.
 
11
Katcher, J. 1997. PostMark: A new filesystem benchmark. Tech. Rep. TR3022, Network Appliance. www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.html.
 
12
 
13
McKusick, M. K. and Ganger, G. R. 1999. Soft updates: A technique for eliminating most synchronous writes in the fast filesystem. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Technical Conference, FREENIX Track (Monterey, Calif.), 1--18.
 
14
OpenBSD. 2005. OpenSSH. www.openssh.org.
 
15
Pendry, J. S. and McKusick, M. K. 1995. Union mounts in 4.4BSD-Lite. In Proceedings of the USENIX Technical Conference on UNIX and Advanced Computing Systems, 25--33.
 
16
Pendry, J. S., Williams, N., and Zadok, E. 2003. Am-utils User Manual, 6.1b3 ed. www.am-utils.org.
17
 
18
Roselli, D., Lorch, J. R., and Anderson, T. E. 2000. A comparison of file system workloads. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Technical Conference (San Diego, Calif.), 41--54.
 
19
Rosenthal, D. S. H. 1990. Evolving the Vnode interface. In Proceedings of the Summer USENIX Technical Conference, 107--18.
 
20
 
21
Wright, C. P., Martino, M., and Zadok, E. 2003. NCryptfs: A secure and convenient cryptographic file system. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Technical Conference (San Antonio, Tex.), 197--210.
 
22
Zadok, E. and Nieh, J. 2000. FiST: A language for stackable file systems. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Technical Conference (San Diego, Calif.), 55--70.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Charles P. Wright: colleagues
Jay Dave: colleagues
Puja Gupta: colleagues
Harikesavan Krishnan: colleagues
David P. Quigley: colleagues
Erez Zadok: colleagues
Mohammad Nayyer Zubair: colleagues