Tables and trees don't mix (very well)

ABSTRACT

There are principal differences between the relational model and XML's tree model. This causes problems in all cases where information from these two worlds has to be brought together. Using a few rules for mapping the incompatible aspects of the two models, it becomes easier to process data in systems which need to work with relational and tree data. The most important requirement for a good mapping is that the conceptual model is available and can thus be used for making mapping decisions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sihem Amer-Yahia , Fang Du , Juliana Freire, A comprehensive solution to the XML-to-relational mapping problem, Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management, November 12-13, 2004, Washington DC, USA [doi>10.1145/1031453.1031461]
• 2: E. F. Codd, A relational model of data for large shared data banks, Communications of the ACM, v.13 n.6, p.377-387, June 1970 [doi>10.1145/362384.362685]
• 3: Jayavel Shanmugasundaram , Eugene Shekita , Rimon Barr , Michael Carey , Bruce Lindsay , Hamid Pirahesh , Berthold Reinwald, Efficiently publishing relational data as XML documents, The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, v.10 n.2-3, p.133-154, September 2001

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.1 Logical Design

General Terms:
Design, Management