The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions

ABSTRACT

Computer-aided learning is fast gaining traction in developing regions as a means to augment classroom instruction. Reasons for using computer-aided learning range from supplementing teacher shortages to starting underprivileged children off in technology, and funding for such initiatives range from state education funds to international agencies and private groups interested in child development. The interaction of children with computers is seen at various levels, from unsupervised self-guided learning at public booths without specific curriculum to highly regulated in-class computer applications with modules designed to go with school curriculum. Such learning is used at various levels from children as young as 5 year-old to high-schoolers. This paper uses field observations of primary school children in India using computer-aided learning modules, and finds patterns by which children who perform better in classroom activities seat themselves in front of computer monitors, and control the mouse, in cases where children are required to share computer resources. We find that in such circumstances, there emerges a pattern of learning, unique to multi-user environments - wherein certain children tend to learn better because of their control of the mouse. This research also shows that while computer aided learning software for children is primarily designed for single-users, the implementation realities of resource-strapped learning environments in developing regions presents a strong case for multi-user design.

REFERENCES

• 1: Oppenheimer, T. (2003) "The Flickering Mind: Saving education from the false promise of technology", Random House Publishers.
• 2: Mukherjee, A. (2002) "Build Robots Create Science - A Constructivist Education Initiative for Indian Schools", Proceedings of Development by Design (dyd 02), Bangalore, India.
• 3: Wang, R, et al. (2004) "Distance Learning Technologies for Basic Education in Disadvantaged Areas" Proceedings of the 8th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE 04).
• 4: Pawar, U.S., and Toyama, K. (2005) "A Cross-Market Taxonomy for ICT-in-Education Projects", Proceedings of Digital Learning 2005, New Delhi.
• 5: Resnick, M., Rusk, N., and Cooke, S. (1998). "The Computer Clubhouse: Technological Fluency in the Inner City". In Schon, D., Sanyal, B., and Mitchell, W. (eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities, MIT Press. pp. 266--286.
• 6: Papert, S., and Harel, I. (1991) "Situating Constructionism", in Constructionism: Research reports and essays, Ablex Publishing, pp.1--11.
• 7: Elaine Van Melle , Luigia Cimellaro , Lyn Shulha, A Dynamic Framework to Guide the Implementation and Evaluation of Educational Technologies, Education and Information Technologies, v.8 n.3, p.267-285, September 2003 [doi>10.1023/A:1026312110143]
• 8: Deryn M. Watson, Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching, Education and Information Technologies, v.6 n.4, p.251-266, December 2001 [doi>10.1023/A:1012976702296]
• 9: Pich, A., and Bokyeong, K. (2003) "Principles of ICT in education and implementation strategies in Singapore, the Province of Alberta in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Korea", Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 32 (4), pp. 315--335
• 10: Gunilla Jedeskog , Jörgen Nissen, ICT in the Classroom: Is Doing More Important than Knowing?, Education and Information Technologies, v.9 n.1, p.37-45, March 2004 [doi>10.1023/B:EAIT.0000024260.17501.e6]
• 11: David Mioduser , Rafi Nachmias , Dorit Tubin , Alona Forkosh-Baruch, Analysis Schema for the Study of Domains and Levels of Pedagogical Innovation in Schools Using ICT, Education and Information Technologies, v.8 n.1, p.23-36, March 2003 [doi>10.1023/A:1023922207476]
• 12: Kori Inkpen , Kellogg S. Booth , Steven D. Gribble , Maria Klawe, Give and take: children collaborating on one computer, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.258-259, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223663]
• 13: Stanton, D., and Neale, H.R. (2003) "The Effects of Multiple Mice on Children's Talk and Interaction", J. Computer Assisted Learning, 19, pp. 229-238.
• 14: Jason Stewart , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin, Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.286-293, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303064]
• 15: Pawar, U., Toyama, K., Pal, J. (2006) "Multiple Mice for Computers in Education in Developing Countries" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006
• 16: Plauché, M., Wooters C, Ramachandran, D., Pal J, Udhaykumar, N. (2006) "Speech Recognition for Illiterate Access to Information and Technology" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education

Keywords:
developing regions