ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bringing communities to the semantic web and the semantic web to communities
Full text PdfPdf (571 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Edinburgh, Scotland
SESSION: E-communities table of contents
Pages: 153 - 162  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-323-9
Authors
K. Faith Lawrence  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
m. c. schraefel  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1135777.1135805
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we consider the types of community networks that are most often codified within the Semantic Web. We propose the recognition of a new structure which fulfils the definition of community used outside the Semantic Web. We argue that the properties inherent in a community allow additional processing to be done with the described relationships existing between entities within the community network. Taking an existing online community as a case study we describe the ontologies and applications that we developed to support this community in the Semantic Web environment and discuss what lessons can be learnt from this exercise and applied in more general settings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Bacon-Smith. Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1992.
 
2
N. K. Baym. Tune In, Log on: Soaps, Fandom and On-line Community. Sage Publications Ltd, 2000.
 
3
BBC Staff Writer. 'amateur culture' set to explode. BBC News Online, 18 July 2005.
 
4
D. Brinkley and L. Miller. Foaf vocabulary specification. Namespace specification document, FOAF, September 2 2004.
 
5
 
6
V. J. Costello. Interactivity and the 'Cyber-Fan': An Exploration of Audience Involvement within the Electronic Fan Culture of the Internet. PhD thesis, The University of Tennessee, August 1999.
 
7
N. Crofts, M. Doerr, T. Gill, S. Stead, and M. S. (eds). Definition of the CIDOC CRM conceptual reference model. Reference document, International Council of Museums, March 2005.
 
8
 
9
C. Doctorow. Metacrap: Putting the torch to seven straw-men of the meta-utopia. Website, August 2001.
10
 
11
E. J. Friedman and P. Resnick. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(2):P. 173 -- 199, 1999.
 
12
 
13
S. C. Herring, I. Kouper, L. A. Scheidt, and E. L. Wright. Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs, 2004.
 
14
H. Jenkins. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Routledge, New York and London, 1992.
 
15
C. Lagoze and J. Hunter. The abc ontology and model. Journal of Digital Information, 2(2), November 2001.
 
16
K. F. Lawrence, M. O. Jewell, M. M. Tuffield, A. Prugel-Bennett, D. E. Millard, M. S. Nixon, m. c. schraefel, and N. R. Shadbolt. Ontomedia - creating an ontology for marking up the contents of heterogeneous media. In Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web ISWC-05 Workshop, November 2005.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
E. Wenger. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
K. Faith Lawrence: colleagues
m. c. schraefel: colleagues