ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multi-attribute coalitional games
Full text PdfPdf (226 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Pages: 170 - 179  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-236-4
Authors
Samuel Ieong  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Yoav Shoham  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134707.1134726
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study coalitional games where the value of cooperation among the agents are solely determined by the attributes the agents possess, with no assumption as to how these attributes jointly determine this value. This framework allows us to model diverse economic interactions by picking the right attributes. We study the computational complexity of two coalitional solution concepts for these games -- the Shapley value and the core. We show how the positive results obtained in this paper imply comparable results for other games studied in the literature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. M. Bilbao, J. R. Fernández, and J. J. López. Complexity in cooperative game theory. http://www.esi.us.es/~mbilbao.
 
2
V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm. Complexity of determining nonemptiness of the core. In Proc. 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 613--618, 2003.
 
3
V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm. Computing Shapley values, manipulating value division schemes, and checking core membership in multi-issue domains. In Proc. 19th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 219--225, 2004.
 
4
I. J. Curiel, J. J. Derks, and S. H. Tijs. On balanced games and games with committee control. OR Spectrum, 11:83--88, 1989.
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
E. Kalai and E. Zemel. Totally balanced games and games of flow. Math. Oper. Res., 7:476--478, 1982.
 
9
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
 
10
M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.
 
11
L. S. Shapley. A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games II, number 28 in Annals of Mathematical Studies, pages 307--317. Princeton University Press, 1953.
 
12
O. Shehory and S. Kraus. Task allocation via coalition formation among autonomous agents. In Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 31--45, 1995.
 
13
O. Shehory and S. Kraus. A kernel-oriented model for autonomous-agent coalition-formation in general environments: Implentation and results. In Proc. 13th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 134--140, 1996.
 
14
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behvaior. Princeton University Press, 1953.
 
15
M. Yokoo, V. Conitzer, T. Sandholm, N. Ohta, and A. Iwasaki. Coalitional games in open anonymous environments. In Proc. 20th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 509--515, 2005.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Samuel Ieong: colleagues
Yoav Shoham: colleagues