ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bid expressiveness and clearing algorithms in multiattribute double auctions
Full text PdfPdf (195 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Pages: 110 - 119  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-236-4
Authors
Yagil Engel  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Michael P. Wellman  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Kevin M. Lochner  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134707.1134720
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate the space of two-sided multiattribute auctions, focusing on the relationship between constraints on the offers traders can express through bids, and the resulting computational problem of determining an optimal set of trades. We develop a formal semantic framework for characterizing expressible offers, and show conditions under which the allocation problem can be separated into first identifying optimal pairwise trades and subsequently optimizing combinations of those trades. We analyze the bilateral matching problem while taking into consideration relevant results from multiattribute utility theory. Network flow models we develop for computing global allocations facilitate classification of the problem space by computational complexity, and provide guidance for developing solution algorithms. Experimental trials help distinguish tractable problem classes for proposed solution techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin. Network Flows. Prentice-Hall, 1993.
 
2
F. Bacchus and A. Grove. Graphical models for preference and utility. In Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 3--10, Montreal, 1995.
 
3
 
4
M. Bichler and J. Kalagnanam. Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. European Journal of Operational Research, 160:380--394, 2005.
 
5
M. Bichler, M. Kaukal, and A. Segev. Multi-attribute auctions for electronic procurement. In Proceedings of the 1st IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, 1999.
 
6
C. Boutilier, T. Sandholm, and R. Shields. Eliciting bid taker non-price preferences in (combinatorial) auctions. In Nineteenth Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 204--211, San Jose, 2004.
 
7
F. Branco. The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 28(1):63--81, 1997.
 
8
Y.-K. Che. Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 24(4):668--680, 1993.
 
9
G. Debreu. Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes, editors, Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press, 1959.
 
10
N. Economides and R. A. Schwartz. Electronic call market trading. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(3), 1995.
 
11
Y. Engel and M. P. Wellman. Multiattribute utility representation for willingness-to-pay functions. Tech. report, Univ. of Michigan, 2006.
 
12
 
13
 
14
J. Gong. Exchanges for complex commodities: Search for optimal matches. Master's thesis, University of South Florida, 2002.
 
15
C. Gonzales and P. Perny. GAI networks for decision making under certainty. In IJCAI-05 workshop on preferences, Edinburgh, 2005.
 
16
 
17
R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, 1976.
18
 
19
D. C. Parkes and J. Kalagnanam. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science, 51:435--451, 2005.
 
20
T. Sandholm and S. Suri. Side constraints and non-price attributes in markets. In IJCAI-01 Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, Seattle, 2001.
 
21
L. J. Schvartzman and M. P. Wellman. Market-based allocation with indivisible bids. In AAMAS-05 Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce, Utrecht, 2005.
 
22
J. Shachat and J. T. Swarthout. Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Technical Report 0310004, Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL, Oct. 2003.
23
 
24
P. R. Wurman, M. P. Wellman, and W. E. Walsh. A parametrization of the auction design space. Games and Economic Behavior, 35: 304--338, 2001.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yagil Engel: colleagues
Michael P. Wellman: colleagues
Kevin M. Lochner: colleagues