| An empirical study on decision making in off-the-shelf component-based development |
| Full text |
Pdf
(63 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Software Engineering
archive
Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Emerging results: program analysis
table of contents
Pages: 897 - 900
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-375-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Jingyue Li
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
|
|
Reidar Conradi
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway and Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway
|
|
Odd Petter N. Slyngstad
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
|
|
Christian Bunse
|
Fraunhofer IESE, Kaiserslautern, Germany
|
|
Marco Torchiano
|
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
|
|
Maurizio Morisio
|
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 101, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Component-based software development (CBSD) is becoming more and more important since it promotes reuse to higher levels of abstraction. As a consequence, many components are available being either open-source software (OSS) or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS). However, it is still unclear how the decision for acquiring OSS or COTS components is made in practice. This paper describes an empirical study on why project decision-makers selected COTS instead of OSS components, or vice versa. The study was performed as an international survey in Norway, Italy and Germany. It focused on decision making on using off-the-shelf (OTS) components. We have gathered answers from 83 projects using only COTS components and 44 projects using only OSS components. Results of this study show significant differences and commonalities of integrating OSS or COTS components. Moreover, the study illustrates several research questions that warrant future research.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Abts, C. et al. COCOTS: A COTS Software Integration Lifecycle CostModel - Model Overview and Preliminary Data Collection Findings. TR: USC-CSE-2000-501, Mar. 2000.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Conradi, R. et al. Reflections on conducting an international CBSE survey in ICT industry. Proc. of the 4th Intl. Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (Noosa Heads, Australia, Nov. 2005), 214--223.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Hissam, S. A. and Weinstock, C. B. Open Source Software: The Other Commercial Software. Proc. of the 1st workshop on open source software engineering. (Toronto, Canada, May, 2001).
|
| |
7
|
Hissam, S. A. et al. Trust and Vulnerability in Open Source Software. IEE Proceedings - Software, 49, 1 (Feb. 2002) 47--51.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Jingyue Li , Reidar Conradi , Odd Petter N. Slyngstad , Christian Bunse , Umair Khan , Marco Torchiano , Maurizio Morisio, Validation of New Theses on Off-the-Shelf Component Based Development, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05), p.26, September 19-22, 2005
[doi> 10.1109/METRICS.2005.53]
|
| |
10
|
Li, J. et al. An Empirical Study on Off-the-Shelf Component Usage in Industrial Projects. Proc. of the 6th Intl. Conf. on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (Oulu, Finland, Jun. 2005), Springer Verlag LNCS Vol. 3547, 54--68.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
OSS Initiative: http://www.opensource.org/index.php
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
|