A research agenda for distributed software development

ABSTRACT

In recent years, a number of business reasons have caused software development to become increasingly distributed. Remote development of software offers several advantages, but it is also fraught with challenges. In this paper, we report on our study of distributed software development that helped shape a research agenda for this field. Our study has identified four areas where important research questions need to be addressed to make distributed development more effective. These areas are: collaborative software tools, knowledge acquisition and management, testing in a distributed set-up and process and metrics issues. We present a brief summary of related research in each of these areas, and also outline open research issues.

REFERENCES

• 1: Nasscom - Mckinsey report 2002 http://www.nasscom.org/artdisplay.asp?Art_id=1225
• 2: Carmel, E. and Agarwal, R. Offshore Sourcing of Information Technology Work by America's Largest Firms. Technical Report, Kogod School, American University, Washington D.C., November 2000.
• 3: Business Week Online, March 1, 2004. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_09/b3872001_mz001.htm
• 4: James D. Herbsleb , Deependra Moitra, Guest Editors' Introduction: Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.16-20, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914732]
• 5: Damian, D. and Zowghi, D. Requirements Engineering challenges in multi-site software development organizations. Requirements Engineering Journal 8, 2003, pages 149--160
• 6: Richard Heeks , S. Krishna , Brian Nicholson , Sundeep Sahay, Synching or Sinking: Global Software Outsourcing Relationships, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.54-60, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914744]
• 7: James D. Herbsleb , Audris Mockus , Thomas A. Finholt , Rebecca E. Grinter, Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.319-328, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/358916.359003]
• 8: Carmel, E. Global Software Teams. Prentice Hall, 1999.
• 9: Rebecca E. Grinter , James D. Herbsleb , Dewayne E. Perry, The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, p.306-315, November 14-17, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/320297.320333]
• 10: Espinosa, J., Kraut, R.E., Lerch, F.J., Slaughter, S.A., Herbsleb, J. and Mockus, A. Shared Mental Models and Coordination in Large-Scale, Distributed Software Development. International Conference in Information Systems 2001
• 11: Christophe Van den Bulte , Rudy K. Moenaert, The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing, Management Science, v.44 n.11 Pt.2, p.1-18, Nov. 1998 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.44.11.S1]
• 12: Olson, G.M, and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 2000
• 13: McDonough, E. F, Kahn, K., and Barczak, G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2001
• 14: Kiesler, S., Cummings, J.N. What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. In Distributed Work, Hinds, P., Kiesler, S. (ed.) 2002
• 15: Werner Kobitzsch , Dieter Rombach , Raimund L. Feldmann, Outsourcing in India, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.78-86, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914751]
• 16: Arora, A., and Gambardella, A. The Globalization of the Software Industry: Perspectives and Opportunities for Developed and Developing Countries. NBER Working Paper No. 10538, June 2004. http://www.nber.org/papers/W10538
• 17: Christof Ebert , Philip De Neve, Surviving Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.62-69, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914748]
• 18: Herbsleb, J.D., and Mockus, A. An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally-Distributed Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(3), 2003
• 19: James D. Herbsleb , Rebecca E. Grinter, Architectures, Coordination, and Distance: Conway's Law and Beyond, IEEE Software, v.16 n.5, p.63-70, September 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.795103]
• 20: S. Krishna , Sundeep Sahay , Geoff Walsham, Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing, Communications of the ACM, v.47 n.4, p.62-66, April 2004 [doi>10.1145/975817.975818]
• 21: Audris Mockus , James D. Herbsleb, Expertise browser: a quantitative approach to identifying expertise, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 19-25, 2002, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/581339.581401]
• 22: Erran Carmel , Ritu Agarwal, Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.22-29, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914734]
• 23: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/clearcase/, http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/clearquest/
• 24: Jarvenpaa, S. and Leidner, D. Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3(4), June, 1998.
• 25: Booch, G. and Brown, A. Collaborative Development Environments. Advances in Computers Vol. 59, Academic Press, August 2003.
• 26: http://www.collab.net, http://sourceforge.net
• 27: http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
• 28: Mark C. Chu-Carroll , Sara Sprenkle, Coven: brewing better collaboration through software configuration management, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.25 n.6, p.88-97, Nov. 2000
• 29: http://sangam.sourceforge.net
• 30: Li-Te Cheng , Cleidson R.B. de Souza , Susanne Hupfer , John Patterson , Steven Ross, Building Collaboration into IDEs, Queue, v.1 n.9, December/January 2003-2004 [doi>10.1145/966789.966803]
• 31: F. Maurer , G. Succi , H. Holz , B. Kötting , S. Goldmann , B. Dellen, Software process support over the Internet, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.642-645, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302913]
• 32: Sinha, V., Sengupta, B., and Chandra, S. EGRET: A Collaborative Tool for Distributed Requirements Management. IBM Research Technical Report, RI06001, 2005.
• 33: T. Graham , H. Stewart , A. Kopaee , A. Ryman , R. Rasouli, A World-Wide-Web Architecture for Collaborative Software Design, Proceedings of the Software Technology and Engineering Practice, p.22, August 30-September 02, 1999
• 34: John Grundy , Ray Welland , Hermann Stoeckle, Workshop on Directions in Software Engineering Environments (WoDiSEE), Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.768-769, May 23-28, 2004
• 35: Allen, T.J. Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT Press, 1977
• 36: Allen, T.J. and Hauptman, O. The Influence of Communication Technologies on Organizational Structure: A Conceptual Model for Future Research. Communication Research 14(5), 1987, pages 575--587.
• 37: http://www.doxygen.org
• 38: Davor Čubranić , Gail C. Murphy, Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 39: G. Wiederhold , M. Bilello, Protecting Inappropriate Release of Data from Realistic Databases, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, p.330, August 26-28, 1998
• 40: Xintao Wu , Yongge Wang , Yuliang Zheng, Privacy preserving database application testing, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, October 30, 2003, Washington, DC [doi>10.1145/1005140.1005159]
• 41: Nabil R. Adam , John C. Worthmann, Security-control methods for statistical databases: a comparative study, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.21 n.4, p.515-556, Dec. 1989 [doi>10.1145/76894.76895]
• 42: Rakesh Agrawal , Ramakrishnan Srikant, Privacy-preserving data mining, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.439-450, May 15-18, 2000, Dallas, Texas, United States
• 43: Domingo-Ferrer, J.Current Directions in Statistical Data Protection. In Proceeding of Statistical Data Protection, 1998.
• 44: Irit Dinur , Kobbi Nissim, Revealing information while preserving privacy, Proceedings of the twenty-second ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, p.202-210, June 09-11, 2003, San Diego, California [doi>10.1145/773153.773173]
• 45: Vladimir Estivill-Castro , Ljiljana Brankovic, Data Swapping: Balancing Privacy against Precision in Mining for Logic Rules, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, p.389-398, September 01, 1999
• 46: David Chays , Saikat Dan , Phyllis G. Frankl , Filippos I. Vokolos , Elaine J. Weber, A framework for testing database applications, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis, p.147-157, August 21-24, 2000, Portland, Oregon, United States
• 47: Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.11 n.3, p.309-346, July 2002 [doi>10.1145/567793.567795]
• 48: Rebecca E. Grinter, Recomposition: putting it all back together again, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.393-402, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289514]
• 49: The World Wide Web Virtual Library: Formal Methods. http://vl.fmnet.info
• 50: Frank DeRemer , Hans Kron, Programming-in-the large versus programming-in-the-small, Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software, p.114-121, April 21-23, 1975, Los Angeles, California
• 51: Grady Booch , James Rumbaugh , Ivar Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language user guide, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1999
• 52: Jos Warmer , Anneke Kleppe, The object constraint language: precise modeling with UML, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1998
• 53: Narayan Ramasubbu , M. S. Krishnan , Prasad Kompalli, Leveraging Global Resources: A Process Maturity Framework for Managing Distributed Development, IEEE Software, v.22 n.3, p.80-86, May 2005 [doi>10.1109/MS.2005.69]
• 54: Managing the Maintenance of Ported, Outsourced, and Legacy Software via Orthogonal Defect Classification, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01), p.726, November 07-09, 2001
• 55: Ram Chillarege , Inderpal S. Bhandari , Jarir K. Chaar , Michael J. Halliday , Diane S. Moebus , Bonnie K. Ray , Man-Yuen Wong, Orthogonal Defect Classification-A Concept for In-Process Measurements, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.18 n.11, p.943-956, November 1992 [doi>10.1109/32.177364]
• 56: Michael A. Cusumano , Chris F. Kemerer, A quantitative analysis of U.S. and Japanese practice and performance in software development, Management Science, v.36 n.11, p.1384-1406, Nov. 1990 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.36.11.1384]
• 57: Michael Cusumano , Alan MacCormack , Chris F. Kemerer , Bill Crandall, Software Development Worldwide: The State of the Practice, IEEE Software, v.20 n.6, p.28-34, November 2003 [doi>10.1109/MS.2003.1241363]
• 58: Dale Walter Karolak, Global Software Development: Managing Virtual Teams and Environments, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999
• 59: Prikladnicki, R., Yamaguti, M. H., Antunes, D. C. Risk Management in Distributed Software Development: A Process Integration Proposal. 5th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises at 18th IFIP World Computer Congress, 2004
• 60: Paul Luo Li , Mary Shaw , Jim Herbsleb , Bonnie Ray , P. Santhanam, Empirical evaluation of defect projection models for widely-deployed production software systems, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.29 n.6, November 2004

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.0 General

General Terms:
Management, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
collaboration, distributed software development, knowledge management, metrics, process, research agenda, testing