Teaching framework for software development methods

ABSTRACT

In this paper we suggest a framework for teaching software development methods (SDMs). Specifically, based on our accumulative research and in-practice experience of teaching SDMs, a set of principles, that guides our teaching of SDMs in different settings and teaching experiences, has been formulated. The teaching framework consists of 14 principles that their actual implementation is varied and adjusted in different teaching environments. This paper outlines the principles and addresses their contribution to learners' understanding of the said software development method.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 2: Kent Beck , Cynthia Andres, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004
• 3: Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A. and Noddings, N. (1990, eds.). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 4, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
• 4: Dubinsky, Y. and Hazzan, O. (2004). Roles in Agile Software Development Teams, Fifth International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, pp. 157--165.
• 5: Dubinsky, Y. and Hazzan, O. (2005). A Framework for teaching software development methods, Computer Science Education 15(4), pp. 275--296.
• 6: Kent Beck , Martin Fowler, Planning Extreme Programming, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2000
• 7: Orit Hazzan, The reflective practitioner perspective in software engineering education, Journal of Systems and Software, v.63 n.3, p.161-171, 15 September 2002 [doi>10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00012-2]
• 8: Orit Hazzan , Yael Dubinsky, Teaching a Software Development Methodology: The Case of Extreme Programming, Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, p.176, March 20-22, 2003
• 9: Hazzan, O. and Dubinsky, Y. (2003B). Bridging cognitive and social chasms in software development using Extreme Programming, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Genova, Italy, pp. 47--53.
• 10: Hazzan, O. and Tomayko, J. (2003). The reflective practitioner perspective in eXtreme Programming, Proceedings of the XP Agile Universe 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 51--61.
• 11: Kerth, N. (2001). Project Retrospective, Dorest House Publishisng.
• 12: Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
• 13: Lawler, J.M. (1999). Metaphors we compute by, In Figures of Thought: For College Writers by D.J. Hickey, Mayfield Publishing.
• 14: Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, BasicBooks,
• 15: Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in The Profession, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• 16: Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A. and Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3, pp. 115--163.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.0 General

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
active learning, constructivism, learning, software development methods, software engineering, software engineering education, teaching