ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Full text PdfPdf (2.94 MB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery table of contents
Chicago, Illinois
Pages: 36 - 43  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-215-1
Authors
Lada A. Adamic  HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA
Natalie Glance  Intelliseek Applied Research Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 98,   Downloads (12 Months): 601,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study the linking patterns and discussion topics of political bloggers. Our aim is to measure the degree of interaction between liberal and conservative blogs, and to uncover any differences in the structure of the two communities. Specifically, we analyze the posts of 40 "A-list" blogs over the period of two months preceding the U.S. Presidential Election of 2004, to study how often they referred to one another and to quantify the overlap in the topics they discussed, both within the liberal and conservative communities, and also across communities. We also study a single day snapshot of over 1,000 political blogs. This snapshot captures blogrolls (the list of links to other blogs frequently found in sidebars), and presents a more static picture of a broader blogosphere. Most significantly, we find differences in the behavior of liberal and conservative blogs, with conservative blogs linking to each other more frequently and in a denser pattern.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
E. Adar. Guess: The graph exploration system. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/projects/guess/guess.html, 2005.
 
3
C. Butts and R. Cross. Blogging for votes: An examination of the interaction between weblogs and the electoral process. Sunbelt XXV presentation.
 
4
D. W. Drezner and H. Farrell. The power and politics of blogs. http://www.danieldrezner.com/research/blogpaperfinal.pdf, 2004.
 
5
N. Glance, M. Hurst, and T. Tomokiyo. BlogPulse: Automated trend discovery for weblogs. In WWW 2004 Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis and Dynamics, 2004.
 
6
 
7
M. Hindman, K. Tsioutsiouliklis, and J. A. Johnson. "googlearchy": How a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the web.www.princeton.edu/~mhindman/googlearchy--hindman.pdf, 2004.
 
8
V. Krebs. The social life of books, visualizing communities of interest via purchase patterns on the www.http://www.orgnet.com/booknet.html, 2004.
 
9
C. Marlow. Audience, structure and authority in the weblog community. In International Communication Association Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2004. http://web.media.mit.edu/~cameron/cv/pubs/04-01.pdf.
 
10
D. M. Pennock, G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, E. J. Glover, and C. L. Giles. Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 99(8):5207--5211, 2002.
 
11
R. Putnam. Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2000.
 
12
C. Shirky. Power laws, weblogs and inequality. http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html, 2003.
 
13
 
14
 
15
P. Welsch. Revolutionary vanguard or echo chamber? political blogs and the mainstream media. Sunbelt XXV presentation, 2005.

CITED BY  21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lada A. Adamic: colleagues
Natalie Glance: colleagues