ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Back to the future: dependable computing = dependable services
Full text PdfPdf (71 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS European Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop table of contents
Saint-Emilion, France
SESSION: Extended abstracts table of contents
Pages: 170 - 173  
Year of Publication: 2002
Authors
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133373.1133406
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Clients are coming to rely more and more on external services to meet the needs of their users, and the clients are increasingly simple caches of soft state -- "truth" is maintained elsewhere. As a result, the user experience of dependability is better served by making those services ultra-dependable than by increasing the reliability of an individual client. We explore here some of the consequences of this statement, and conclude that developing scalable, dependable services may be a more fruitful approach than an extreme emphasis on "dependable OSes". Along the way we look at quantifying "dependability" in this new world; some of what it takes to provide dependable, large-scale services; and some approaches that we are exploring to do so.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Rebecca Braynard, Dejan Kostić, Adolfo Rodriguez, Jeffrey Chase, and Amin Vahdat. Opus: an Overlay Peer Utility Service. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Open Architectures and Network Programming (OPENARCH), June 2002.
3
 
4
Hewlett Packard Corporation. Utility Data Center. www.hp.com/solutions1/infrastructure/solutions/utilitydata/overview/, 2001.
 
5
Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, Jeffrey Nick, and Steven Tuecke. The Physiology of the Grid: An Open Grid Services Architecture for Distributed Systems Integration, January 2002.
 
6
Patrick Goldsack. SmartFrog: a framework for configuration. In Large Scale System Configuration Workshop, November 2001.
 
7
 
8
John Wilkes, Patrick Goldsack, G. (John) Janakiraman, Lance Russell, Sharad Singhal, and Andrew Thomas. eOS - The Dawn of the Resource Economy. Technical report, HP Laboratories, May 2001. Available from http://www.hpl.hp.com/ssp/papers.
 
9
Haifeng Yu and Amin Vahdat. Design and Evaluation of a Continuous Consistency Model for Replicated Services. In Proceedings of Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), October 2000.
 
10
Haifeng Yu and Amin Vahdat. Minimal Replication Cost for Availability. Technical report, Duke University, January 2002. Submitted for publication.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey Chase: colleagues
Amin Vahdat: colleagues
John Wilkes: colleagues