ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automating data dependability
Full text PdfPdf (107 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS European Workshop archive
Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop table of contents
Saint-Emilion, France
SESSION: Security & authentication table of contents
Pages: 93 - 100  
Year of Publication: 2002
Authors
Kimberly Keeton  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA
John Wilkes  Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133373.1133391
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

If you can't make your data dependable, then you can't make your computing dependable, either. The good news is that the list of data protection techniques is long, and growing. The bad news is that the choices they offer are getting more complicated: how many copies of data to keep? whether to use full or partial redundancy? how often to make snapshots? how to schedule full and incremental backups? what combination of techniques to use? The stakes are getting higher: web access means that services must have 24x7 availability, and users are willing to switch if services are unavailable. Finally, human administrators can (and often do) make mistakes. These factors compel us to simplify and automate data dependability decisions as much as possible.We are developing a system that will automatically select which data protection techniques to use, and how to apply them, to meet user-specified dependability (i.e., reliability and availability) goals. This paper describes our approach and outlines our initial descriptions for user requirements, failure characteristics and data protection techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
E. Anderson, M. Kallahalla, S. Spence, R. Swaminathan, and Q. Wang. "Ergastulum: an approach to solving the workload and device configuration problem," HP Laboratories SSP technical memo HPL-SSP-2001-05, May 2002.
 
4
 
5
A. Avizienis, J.-C. Laprie and B. Randell. "Fundamental concepts of dependability," Proc. of the 3rd Information Survivability Workshop, October 2000, pp. 7--12.
 
6
 
7
A. Brown and D. Patterson. "Towards availability benchmarks: a case study of software RAID systems," Proc. of the 2000 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, June 2000, pp. 263--276.
8
 
9
B. Haverkort, R. Marie, G. Rubino and K. Trivedi, eds. Performability modeling: techniques and tools, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, May 2001.
 
10
 
11
D. Patterson. "A new focus for a new century: availability and maintainability ≫ performance," Keynote speech at USENIX FAST, January 2002. Available from http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/fast02/.
12
 
13
 
14
J. Strunk. et al. "Self-securing storage: protecting data in compromised systems," Proc. of Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), San Diego, CA, October 2000, pp. 165--180.
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
J. Wylie, et al. "Selecting the right data distribution scheme for a survivable storage system," Technical report CMU-CS-01-120, Carnegie Mellon University, May 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kimberly Keeton: colleagues
John Wilkes: colleagues