ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
TAPRAV: a tool for exploring workload aligned to models of task execution
Full text PdfPdf (400 KB)
Source AVI archive
Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces table of contents
Venezia, Italy
SESSION: Visualization: short papers table of contents
Pages: 467 - 470  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-353-0
Authors
Brian P. Bailey  University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Chris W. Busbey  University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133265.1133360
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Existing analysis tools are not sufficient for exploring pupillary response, as the data typically needs to be explored in relation to the corresponding task's execution. To address this need, we have developed an interactive visualization tool called TAPRAV. Key components include (i) a visualization of the pupillary response aligned to the model of task execution, useful for making sense of the overall data set; (ii) an interactive overview+detail metaphor, enabling rapid inspection of details; (iii) synchronization with the video of screen interaction, providing awareness of the state of the task; and (iv) interaction supporting discovery driven analysis.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Backs, R. W. and L. C. Walrath. Eye Movement and Pupillary Response Indices of Mental Workload During Visual Search of Symbolic Displays. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 243--254.
2
 
3
Beatty, J. Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91 (2), 276--292.
 
4
5
 
6
Granholm, E., R. F. Asarnow, A. J. Sarkin and K. L. Dykes. Pupillary Responses Index Cognitive Resource Limitations. Psychophysiology, 33 (4), 457--461.
7
8
9
 
10
Kok, A. Event-Related-Potential (ERP) Reflections of Mental Resources: A Review and Synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19--56.
11
 
12
Marshall, S. P. The Index of Cognitive Activity: Measuring Cognitive Workload. Proc. IEEE Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, 2002, 7.5--7.9.
13
 
14
Miyata, Y. and D. A. Norman. Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, 265--284.
 
15
Pomplun, M. and S. Sunkara. Pupil Dilation as an Indicator of Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction. Proc. International Conference on HCI, 2003.
 
16
17
 
18
Schacter, D. EEG Theta Waves and Psychological Phenomena: A Review and Analysis. Biological Psychology, 5 (1), 47--82.
 
19
Schluroff, M., et al. Pupillary Responses to Syntactic Ambiguity of Sentences. Brain and Language, 27, 322--344.
 
20
Spence, R. and M. Apperley. Database Navigation: An Office Environment for the Professional. BIT, 1 (1), 43--54.
 
21
 
22
Verney, S. P., E. Granholm and D. P. Dionisio. Pupillary Responses and Processing Resources on the Visual Backward Masking Task. Psychophysiology, 38 (1), 76--83.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brian P. Bailey: colleagues
Chris W. Busbey: colleagues