ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
TWIST: a scalable and reconfigurable testbed for wireless indoor experiments with sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (3.11 MB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop ad hoc networks: from theory to reality table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 63 - 70  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-360-3
Authors
Vlado Handziski  Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Andreas Köpke  Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Andreas Willig  Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Adam Wolisz  Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 98,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132983.1132995
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present TWIST, a scalable and exible testbed architecture for indoor deployment of wireless sensor networks. The design of TWIST is based on an analysis of typical and desirable use-cases. It provides basic services like node configuration, network-wide programming, out-of-band extraction of debug data and gathering of application data, and also introduces several novel features.Firstly, TWIST supports experiments with heterogeneous node platforms. Secondly, it supports active power supply control of the nodes. This enables easy transition between USB-powered and battery-powered experiments, dynamic selection of topologies as well as controlled injection of node failures into the system. Thirdly, TWIST supports creation of both at and hierarchical sensor networks. For this we introduce a layer of "super nodes" that on one hand form a part of the testbed infrastructure but can also play a role as elements of the sensor network.The self-configuration capability, the use of hardware with standardized interfaces and open-source software makes the TWIST architecture scalable, affordable, and easily repli-cable. To demonstrate its usefulness, we present our experiences with building and using a specific realization of TWIST that spans three floors of our office building and supports over one hundred sensor nodes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. N. Chun, P. Buonadonna, A. AuYoung, C. Ng, D. C.Parkes, J. Shneidman, A. C. Snoeren, and A. Vahdat. Mirage: A microeconomic resource allocation system for sensornet testbeds. In Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, May 2005.
 
2
Crossbow. Stargate. http://www.xbow.com/Products/XScale.htm.
3
 
4
ETH Zürich. BTNodes rev. 3, 2005.
 
5
L. Girod, J. Elson, A. Cerpa, T. Stathopoulos,N. Ramanathan, and D. Estrin. Emstar: a software environment for developing and deploying wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of USENIX General Track 2004, June 2004.
6
 
7
V. Handziski, A. Köpke, A. Willig, and A. Wolisz. Twist: A scalable and reconfigurable wireless sensor network testbed for indoor deployments. Technical Report TKN-05-008, Telecommunication Networks Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Nov. 2005.
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
LAN/MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange between systems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Specific requirements -- Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control(MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), Oct. 2003.
 
13
M. Lauer. Building Linux distributions with bitbake and openembedded. In Proc. of the Free and Open Source Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM 2005), Feb. 2005.
 
14
S. F. Li, V. Handziski, A. Köpke, M. Kubisch, and A. Wolisz. A wireless sensor network testbed supporting controlled in-building experiments. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. Conference Sensor 2005, volume 1, May 2005.
 
15
D. L. Mills. Network time protocol (version 3) specification, implementation and analysis. RFC 1305, 1992.
 
16
The openslug Linux distribution. http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/OpenSlug/HomePage.
 
17
 
18
T. Schmid, H. Dubois-Ferriere, and M. Vetterli. Sensorscope: Experiences with a wireless building monitoring sensor network. In Proc. of the Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN'05), June 2005.
 
19
G. Tolle and D. Culler. Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ofthe 2nd European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN), Feb. 2005.
 
20
Omega testbed at UC Berkeley, Telos (Revision B) 802.15.4 wireless sensor network. http://omega.cs.berkeley.edu/.
 
21
O. S. University. Kansei: Sensor testbed for at-scale experiments. In Poster, 2nd Intl. TinyOS Technology Exchange, Feb. 2005.
22
 
23
24
 
25
Wasal testbed. http://http://wasal.epfl.ch/.
26


Collaborative Colleagues:
Vlado Handziski: colleagues
Andreas Köpke: colleagues
Andreas Willig: colleagues
Adam Wolisz: colleagues