ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An evaluation of inter-vehicle ad hoc networks based on realistic vehicular traces
Full text PdfPdf (629 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Analysis, simulation and experimentation table of contents
Pages: 108 - 119  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-368-9
Authors
Valery Naumov  ETH Zurich, Zurich Switzerland
Rainer Baumann  ETH Zurich, Zurich Switzerland
Thomas Gross  ETH Zurich, Zurich Switzerland
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 98,   Downloads (12 Months): 517,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132905.1132918
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) using WLAN tech-nology have recently received considerable attention. The evaluation of VANET routing protocols often involves simulators since management and operation of a large number of real vehicular nodes is expensive. We study the behavior of routing protocols in VANETs by using mobility information obtained from a microscopic vehicular traffic simulator that is based on the on the real road maps of Switzerland. The performance of AODV and GPSR is significantly in uenced by the choice of mobility model, and we observe a significantly reduced packet delivery ratio when employing the realistic traffic simulator to control mobility of nodes. To address the performance limitations of communication pro-tocols in VANETs, we investigate two improvements that increase the packet delivery ratio and reduce the delay until the first packet arrives. The traces used in this study are available for public download.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
LAN MAN standards committee of the IEEE computer society. Wireless lan medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE standard 802.11. Technical report, 1999.
 
2
Joe Bardwell. Converting signal strength percentage to dBm alues. WildPackets' White Paper, November 2002.
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. In MOBICOM'02, pages 483--502, August 2002.
 
9
10
 
11
T. Clausen, P. Jacquet, A. Laouiti, and P. Muhlethaler et al. Optimized link state routing protocol. In IEEE INMIC'01, pages 151--162, 2001.
 
12
S. Das, Ch. Perkins, and E. Royer. Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. In INFOCOM'00, pages 3--12, 2000.
 
13
N. Eude, B. Ducourthial, and M. Shawky. Enhancing ns-2 simulator for high mobility ad hoc networks in car-to-car communication context. In MWCN'05, September 2005.
 
14
K. Fall. Ns notes and documentation. The VINT Project, 2000.
 
15
J. Jetcheva, Y. Hu, S. PalChaudhuri, A. Saha, and D. Johnson. Design and evaluation of a metropolitan area multitier wireless ad hoc network architecture. In WMCSA'03, pages 32--43, Monterey, CA, October 2003.
 
16
D. Johnson. Validation of wireless and mobile network models and simulation. In DARPA/NIST Network Simulation Validation Workshop, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, May 1999.
 
17
18
19
20
21
22
 
23
C. Lochert et al. A routing strategy for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments. In IVS'03, pages 156--161, June 2003.
 
24
J. Luo and J.-P. Hubaux. A survey of inter-vehicle communication. Technical Report IC/2004/24, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2004.
25
 
26
27
 
28
R. Ogier, F. Templin, and M.Lewis. Topology dissemenation based on reverse-path forwarding (TBRPF). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3684.txt, Internet Draft, IETF, February 2004. (Work in progress).
 
29
G. Pei, M. Gerla, X. Hong, and C. Chiang. A wireless hierarchical routing protocol with group mobility. In IEEE WCNC'99, pages 1536--1540, New Orleans, LA, September 1999.
 
30
W. Peng and X. Lu. Efficient broadcast in mobile ad hoc networks using connected dominating set. Journal of Software, 1999.
 
31
 
32
W. Peng and X. Lu. AHBP: An efficient broadcast protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Science and Technology, 2002.
 
33
Ch. Perkins, E. Royer, and S. Das. Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing. draft-ietf-manet-aodv-10.txt, Internet Draft, IETF, March 2002. (Work in progress).
 
34
B. Raney, A. Voellmy, M. Vrtic, K. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. An agent-based microsimulation model of Swiss travel. Networks and Spatial Economics, 3:23--41, 2003.
 
35
 
36
S. Ray, J. Carruthers, and D. Starobinski. RTS/CTS-induced congestion in ad-hoc wireless lans. In IEEE WCNC'03, pages 1516--1521, March 2003.
37
 
38
H. Sawant, J. Tan, and Q. Yang. Study of an inter-vehicle communication protocol for vehicle-infrastructure integration (VII). In Transportation Research Board 84th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2005.
 
39
J. Singh et el. Wireless lan performance under varied stress conditions in vehicular traffic scenario. In VTC'02, volume 2, pages 743--747. IEEE, 2002.
 
40
J. Sucec and I. Marsic. An efficient distributed network-wide broacast algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. Technical Report 248, CAIP, Rutgers University, September 2000.
41
42
 
43
J. Yoon, M. Liu, and B. Noble. Random waypoint considered harmful. In INFOCOM'03, pages 1312--1321, San Fransisco, California, USA, April 2003.
44
 
45
M. Zorzi and R. Rao. Geographic random forwarding (GERAF) for ad hoc and sensor networks: multihop performance. In IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 2(4), October 2003.

CITED BY  17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Valery Naumov: colleagues
Rainer Baumann: colleagues
Thomas Gross: colleagues