ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism
Full text PdfPdf (359 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 14A table of contents
Pages: 604 - 617  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Sean Hallgren  NEC Laboratories America
Cristopher Moore  University of New Mexico
Martin Rötteler  NEC Laboratories America
Alexander Russell  University of Connecticut
Pranab Sen  NEC Laboratories America
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132603
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It has been known for some time that graph isomorphism reduces to the hidden subgroup problem (HSP). What is more, most exponential speedups in quantum computation are obtained by solving instances of the HSP. A common feature of the resulting algorithms is the use of quantum coset states, which encode the hidden subgroup. An open question has been how hard it is to use these states to solve graph isomorphism. It was recently shown by Moore, Russell, and Schulman [30] that only an exponentially small amount of information is available from one, or a pair of coset states. A potential source of power to exploit are entangled quantum measurements that act jointly on many states at once. We show that entangled quantum measurements on at least Ω(n log n) coset states are necessary to get useful information for the case of graph isomorphism, matching an information theoretic upper bound. This may be viewed as a negative result because highly entangled measurements seem hard to implement in general. Our main theorem is very general and also rules out using joint measurements on few coset states for some other groups, such as GL(n,Fpm) and Gn where G is finite and satisfies a suitable property.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Alagic, C. Moore, and A. Russell. Strong Fourier sampling fails over Gn. ArXiv preprint quant-ph/0511054, 2005.
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
Y. G. Berkovich and E. M. Zhmud. Characters of finite groups, part 2, volume 181 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 1999.
 
7
 
8
A. Childs and P. Wocjan. On the quantum hardness of solving isomorphism problems as nonabelian hidden shift problems. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0510185, 2005.
 
9
 
10
M. Ettinger, P. Hoyer, and E. Knill. A quantum observable for the graph isomorphism problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901029, 1999.
 
11
M. Ettinger, P. Hoyer, and E. Knill. Hidden subgroup states are almost orthogonal. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901034, 1999.
12
 
13
W. Fulton and J. Harris. Representation theory: A first course, volume 129 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 1991.
 
14
P. X. Gallagher. Character values at involutions. Proceeedings of the American Mathematical Society, 120(3):657--659, 1994.
 
15
16
17
18
 
19
S. Hallgren, M. Rötteler, and P. Sen. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0511148.
 
20
S. Hallgren, A. Russell, and A. Ta-Shma. The hidden subgroup problem and quantum computation using group representations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(4):916--934, 2003.
 
21
I. M. Isaacs. Character theory of finite groups. Academic Press, 1976.
 
22
G. Ivanyos, F. Magniez, and M. Santha. Efficient quantum algorithms for some instances of the non-abelian hidden subgroup problem. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, pages 723--740, 2003. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0102014.
 
23
G. James and A. Kerber. The representation theory of the symmetric group. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981.
 
24
A. Y. Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9511026, 1995.
 
25
J. Köbler, U. Schöning, and J. Torán. The graph isomorphism problem. Birkhäuser, 1993.
 
26
G. Kuperberg. A subexponential-time quantum algorithm for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0302112, 2003.
 
27
J. D. Lafferty and D. Rockmore. Fast Fourier analysis for rm SL2 over a finite field and related numerical experiments. Experimental Mathematics, 1(2):115--139, 1992.
 
28
 
29
C. Moore and A. Russell. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling: Part II. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501066, 2005.
 
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
J. Radhakrishnan, M. Rötteler, and P. Sen. On the power of random bases in Fourier sampling: Hidden subgroup problem in the Heisenberg group. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3580, pages 1399--1411. Springer-Verlag, 2005. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0503114.
 
34
Y. Roichman. Upper bound on the characters of the symmetric groups. Inventiones Mathematicae, 125:451--485, 1996.
35
 
36
P. Sen. Random measurement bases, quantum state distinction and applications to the hidden subgroup problem. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2006. To appear. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0512085.
 
37
J. P. Serre. Linear representations of finite groups. Springer, 1977.
 
38
 
39
D. R. Simon. On the power of quantum computation. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 116--123, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Computer Society Press.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sean Hallgren: colleagues
Cristopher Moore: colleagues
Martin Rötteler: colleagues
Alexander Russell: colleagues
Pranab Sen: colleagues