ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Building triangulations using ε-nets
Full text PdfPdf (286 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 8A table of contents
Pages: 326 - 335  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Author
Kenneth L. Clarkson  Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132564
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work addresses the problem of approximating a manifold by a simplicial mesh, and the related problem of building triangulations for the purpose of piecewise-linear approximation of functions. It has long been understood that the vertices of such meshes or triangulations should be "well-distributed," or satisfy certain "sampling conditions." This work clarifies and extends some algorithms for finding such well-distributed vertices, by showing that they can be regarded as finding ε-nets or Delone sets in appropriate metric spaces. In some cases where such Delone properties were already understood, such as for meshes to approximate smooth manifolds that bound convex bodies, the upper and lower bound results are extended to more general manifolds; in particular, under some general conditions, the minimum Hausdorff distance for a mesh with n simplices to a d-manifold M is Θ((∫M√|κ(x)|/n)2/d) as n ⋺ ∞, where κ(x) is the Gaussian curvature at point x ∈ M. We also relate these constructions to Dudley's approximation scheme for convex bodies, which can be interpreted as involving an ε-net in a metric space whose distance function depends on surface normals.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Agarwal, S. Har-Peled, and K. Varadarajan. Geometric approximation via coresets. In E. Welzl, editor, Current Trends in Combinatorial and Computational Geometry. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
 
2
N. Amenta, S. Choi, and R. Kolluri. The power crust, unions of balls, and the medial axis transform. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 19:127--153, 2001.
3
 
4
L. Chen, P. Sun, and J. Xu. Optimal anisotropic simplicial meshes for minimizing interpolation errors in lp-norm. Math. Comp., To Appear.
 
5
P. T. Chruściel, J. Fu, G. Galloway, and R. E. Howard. On fine differentiability properties of horizons and applications to Riemannian geometry. J. Geometry and Physics, 41:1--12, 2002.
6
7
 
8
C. D. Cutler. A review of the theory and estimation of fractal dimension. In H. Tong, editor, Dimension Estimation and Models. World Scientific, 1993.
 
9
 
10
R. M. Dudley. Metric entropy of some classes of sets with differentiable boundaries. J. Approximation Theory, 10:227--236, 1974.
 
11
Y. Eldar, M. Lindenbaum, M. Porat, and Y. Zeevi. The farthest point strategy for progressive image sampling, 1997.
 
12
J. Erickson. Personal Communication.
 
13
T. Gonzalez. Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 38:293--306, 1985.
 
14
P. M. Gruber. Asymptotic estimates for best and stepwise approximation of convex bodies I. Forum Math., 5:281--297, 1993.
 
15
P. M. Gruber. Optimum quantization and its applications. Adv. Math., 186:456--497, 2004.
 
16
17
 
18
M. Ludwig. Asymptotic approximation of convex curves; the Hausdorff metric case. Arch. Math., 70:331--336, 1998.
 
19
E. Nadler. Piecewise linear best l2 approximation on triangulations. In C. K. Chui, L. L. Schumaker, and J. D. Ward, editors, Approximation Theory V, pages 499--502. Academic Press, 1986.
 
20
G. Peyré and L. D. Cohen. Geodesic computations for fast and accurate surface remeshing and parameterization. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, 63:157--171, 2005.
 
21
H. Pottmann, R. Krasauskas, B. Hamann, K. Joy, and W. Seibold. On piecewise linear approximation of quadratic functions. J. Geom. Graphics, 4:31--53, 2000.
 
22
H. Pottmann, T. Steiner, M. Hofer, C. Haider, and A. Hanbury. The isophotic metric and its application to feature sensitive morphology on surfaces. In T. Pajdla and J. Matas, editors, Computer Vision --- ECCV 2004, Part IV, volume 3024 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 560--572. Springer, 2004.
 
23
J. R. Shewchuk. What is a good linear finite element? Interpolation, conditioning, anisotropy, and quality measures. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/papers/elemj.pdf, 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenneth L. Clarkson: colleagues