ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Pricing for fairness: distributed resource allocation for multiple objectives
Full text PdfPdf (297 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 4B table of contents
Pages: 197 - 204  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Sung-woo Cho  University of Southern California
Ashish Goel  Stanford University
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132545
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a simple distributed algorithm for resource allocation which simultaneously approximates the optimum value for a large class of objective functions. In particular, we consider the class of canonical utility functions U that are symmetric, non-decreasing, concave, and satisfy U(0) = 0. Our distributed algorithm is based on primal-dual updates. We prove that this algorithm is an O(log ρ)-approximation for all canonical utility functions simultaneously, i.e. without any knowledge of U. The algorithm needs at most O(log2 ρ) iterations. Here n is the number of flows, m is the number of edges, R is the ratio between the maximum capacity and the minimum capacity of the edges in the network, and ρ is max (n, m, R).We extend this result to multi-path routing, and also to a natural pricing mechanism that results in a simple and practical protocol for bandwidth allocation in a network. When the protocol reaches equilibrium, the allocated bandwidths are the same as when the distributed algorithm converges; hence the protocol is also an O(log ρ) approximation for all canonical utility functions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
A. Awerbuch and Y. Azar. Local optimization of global objectives: competitive distributed deadlock resolution and resource allocation. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 240--49, 1994.
 
3
B. Awerbuch and Y. Shavitt. Converging to approximated max-min flow fairness in logarithmic time. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Infocom conference, pages 1350--57, 1998.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
S. Cho and A. Goel. Bandwidth allocation in networks: a single dual-update subroutine for multiple objectives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (proceedings of the first Workshop on Combinatorial and Algorithmic Aspects of Networks (CAAN), Aug 2004), 3405:28--41.
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
A. Goel and A. Meyerson. Simultaneous optimization via approximate majorization for concave profits or convex costs. Algorithmica, 44(4):301--323, May 2006.
 
13
14
 
15
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, and G. Polya. Some simple inequalities satisfied by convex functions. Messenger Math., 58:145--152, 1929.
 
16
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, and G. Polya. Inequalities. 1st ed., 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, London and New York., 1934, 1952.
 
17
F.P. Kelly, A.K. Maulloo, and D.K.H. Tan. Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49:237--252, 1998.
 
18
 
19
20
21
 
22
A.W. Marshall and I. Olkin. Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press (Volume 143 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering), 1979.
 
23
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sung-woo Cho: colleagues
Ashish Goel: colleagues