ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the solution-space geometry of random constraint satisfaction problems
Full text PdfPdf (187 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 4A table of contents
Pages: 130 - 139  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Dimitris Achlioptas  University of California Santa Cruz
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi  University of Rome "La Sapienza"
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132537
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For a number of random constraint satisfaction problems, such as random k-SAT and random graph/hypergraph coloring, there are very good estimates of the largest constraint density for which solutions exist. Yet, all known polynomial-time algorithms for these problems fail to find solutions even at much lower densities. To understand the origin of this gap we study how the structure of the space of solutions evolves in such problems as constraints are added. In particular, we prove that much before solutions disappear, they organize into an exponential number of clusters, each of which is relatively small and far apart from all other clusters. Moreover, inside each cluster most variables are frozen, i.e., take only one value. The existence of such frozen variables gives a satisfying intuitive explanation for the failure of the polynomial-time algorithms analyzed so far. At the same time, our results establish rigorously one of the two main hypotheses underlying Survey Propagation, a heuristic introduced by physicists in recent years that appears to perform extraordinarily well on random constraint satisfaction problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Achlioptas, J. Thorpe, manuscript.
 
2
 
3
D. Achlioptas, A. Naor, The two possible values of the chromatic number of a random graph, Annals of Mathematics, 162 (3) (2005), 1333--1349.
 
4
D. Achlioptas, A. Naor, and Y. Peres, Rigorous location of phase transitions in hard optimization problems, Nature, 435, June 9th 2005, 759--764.
 
5
D. Achlioptas, Y. Peres, The threshold for random k-SAT is 2k ln 2 - O(k), Journal of American Mathematical Society, 17 (2004), 947--973.
 
6
S. Aji, R.J. McEliece, The Generalized Distributive Law, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 46 (2000), 325--343.
 
7
 
8
A. Braunstein, R. Zecchina, Survey propagation as local equilibrium equations, J. Stat. Mech., (2004), P06007.
 
9
 
10
V. Chvátal, B. Reed. Mick gets some (the odds are on his side), In Proc. 33th STOC, 620--627, 1992.
 
11
 
12
O. Dubois, Y. Boufkhad, and J. Mandler. Typical random 3-SAT formulae and the satisfiability threshold, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 10 (2003).
 
13
E. Friedgut, personal communication.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
A. Kaporis, L. M. Kirousis, and E. G. Lalas. Selecting complementary pairs of literals, In Proc. LICS '03 workshop on Typical Case Complexity and Phase Transitions, 2003.
 
18
 
19
 
20
M. Mézard, T. Mora, and R. Zecchina, Clustering of Solutions in the Random Satisfiability Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005), 197205. Also, cond-mat/0504070.
 
21
M. Mézard, T. Mora, and R. Zecchina, Pairs of SAT Assignments and Clustering in Random Boolean Formulae, cond-mat/0506053, June 2nd 2005.
 
22
M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and R. Zecchina, Analytic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems, Science 297 (2002), 812--815.
 
23
N. C. Wormald, Differential equations for random processes and random graphs, Ann. App. Prob. , 5 (1995), 1217--1235.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dimitris Achlioptas: colleagues
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi: colleagues