ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Santa Claus problem
Full text PdfPdf (269 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 1B table of contents
Pages: 31 - 40  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Nikhil Bansal  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Maxim Sviridenko  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 33,   Downloads (12 Months): 206,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132522
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the following problem: The Santa Claus has n presents that he wants to distribute among m kids. Each kid has an arbitrary value for each present. Let pij be the value that kid i has for present j. The Santa's goal is to distribute presents in such a way that the least lucky kid is as happy as possible, i.e he tries to maximize mini=1,...,m sumj ∈ Si pij where Si is a set of presents received by the i-th kid.Our main result is an O(log log m/log log log m) approximation algorithm for the restricted assignment case of the problem when pij ∈ pj,0 (i.e. when present j has either value pj or 0 for each kid). Our algorithm is based on rounding a certain natural exponentially large linear programming relaxation usually referred to as the configuration LP. We also show that the configuration LP has an integrality gap of Ω(m1/2) in the general case, when pij can be arbitrary.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N. Alon and J. Spencer. The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2000.
 
2
Y. Azar and L. Epstein. On-line machine covering. Journal of Scheduling, 1(2):67--77, 1998.
3
 
4
J. Csirik, H. Kellerer, and G. Woeginger. The exact lpt-bound for maximizing the minimum completion time. Operations Research Letters, 11(5):281--287, 19982.
 
5
B. Deuermeyer, D. Friesen, and M. Langston. Scheduling to maximize the minimum processor finish time in a multiprocessor system. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods, 3(2):190--196, 1982.
 
6
D. Golovin. Max-min fair allocation of indivisible goods. Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU-CS-05-144, 2005.
 
7
N. Karmarkar and R. M. Karp. An efficient approximation scheme for the one-dimensional bin-packing problem. In Procedeeings of Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 312--320, 1982.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
G. Woeginger. A polynomial-time approximation scheme for maximizing the minimum machine completion time. Oper. Res. Lett., 20(4):149--154, 1997.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nikhil Bansal: colleagues
Maxim Sviridenko: colleagues