ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Gowers uniformity, influence of variables, and PCPs
Full text PdfPdf (236 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 1A table of contents
Pages: 11 - 20  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Alex Samorodnitsky  Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Luca Trevisan  U.C. Berkeley
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132519
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We return to the study of the relation of query complexity and soundness in probabilistically checkable proofs.We present a PCP verifier for languages that are Unique-Games-Hard and such that the verifier makes q queries, has almost perfect completeness, and has soundness error at most 2q/2q+ε, for arbitrarily small ε>0. For values of q of the form 2t-1, the soundness error is (q+1)/2q+ε.Charikar et al. show that there is a constant c such that for every language that has a verifier of query complexity q, and a ratio of soundness error to completeness smaller than cq/2q is decidable in polynomial time. Up to the value of the multiplicative constant and to the validity of the Unique Games Conjecture, our result is therefore tight.As a corollary, we show that approximating the Maximum Independent Set problem in graphs of degree Δ within a factor better than Δ/(log Δ)c is Unique-Games-Hard for a certain constant c>0.Our main technical results are (i) a connection between the Gowers uniformity of a Boolean function and the influence of its variables and (ii) the proof that "Gowers uniform" functions pass the "hypergraph linearity test" approximately with the same probability of a random function. The connection between Gowers uniformity and influence might have other applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Noga Alon, Tali Kaufman, Michael Krivelevich, Simon Litsyn, and Dana Ron. Testing low-degree polynomials over GF(2). In Proceedings of RANDOM-APPROX, pages 188--199, 2003.
3
 
4
Sanjeev Arora. How NP got a new definition: a survey of probabilistically checkable proofs. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pages 637--648, 2002. Volume 3.
5
 
6
M. Bellare, D. Coppersmith, J. Håstad, M. Kiwi, and M. Sudan. Linearity testing over characteristic two. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42(6):1781--1795, 1996.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Irit Dinur and Shmuel Safra. On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex-cover. Annals of Mathematics, 162(1):439--486, 2005.
 
11
Lars Engebretsen and Jonas Holmerin. More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSP. pages 194--205, 2005.
 
12
Uriel Feige. Approximation thresholds for combinatorial optimization problems. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pages 649--658, 2002. Volume 3.
 
13
Timothy Gowers. A new proof of Szemèredi's theorem for progressions of length four. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 8(3):529--551, 1998.
 
14
Timothy Gowers. A new proof of Szemèredi's theorem. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 11(3):465--588, 2001.
 
15
Ben Green and Terence Tao. The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. To appear in Annals of Mathematics. math.NT/0404188, 2004.
 
16
Ben Green and Terence Tao. An inverse theorem for the Gowers U3 norm. math.NT/0503014, 2005.
 
17
J. Håstad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1?ε. Acta Mathematica, 182:105--142, 1999.
18
 
19
Gustav Hast. Approximating Max kCSP - outperforming a random assignment with almost a linear factor. pages 956--968, 2005.
 
20
Bernard Host and Bryna Kra. Nonconventional ergodic averages and nilmanifolds. Annals of Mathematics, 161(1):397--488, 2005.
 
21
 
22
 
23
J. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial The influence of variables on boolean functions. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 68--80, 1988.
24
 
25
 
26
Subhash Khot and Oded Regev. Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2 ?- ε. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003.
 
27
 
28
Bryna Kra. The Green-Tao theorem on arithmetic progressions in the primes: an ergodic point of view. Bulletin of the AMS. To appear.
 
29
 
30
Alex Samorodnitsky. Hypergraph linearity and quadraticity tests for boolean functions. Manuscript, 2005.
31
 
32
Luca Trevisan. Parallel approximation algorithms by positive linear programming. Algorithmica, 21(1):72--88, 1998. Preliminary version in Proc. of ESA'96.
33
 
34
Luca Trevisan. Inapproximability of combinatorial optimization problems. Technical Report TR04-065, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2004.
 
35

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alex Samorodnitsky: colleagues
Luca Trevisan: colleagues