ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A complete and fully qualified design flow for verification of mixed-signal SoC with embedded flash memories
Full text PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source Design, Automation, and Test in Europe archive
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe: Designers' forum table of contents
Munich, Germany
SESSION: Specification and verification table of contents
Pages: 94 - 99  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN ~ ISSN:478061 , 3-9810801-0-6
Author
Pierluigi Daglio  STMicroelectronics, Agrate Brianza, Milan, Italy
Sponsors
EDAA : European Design and Automation Association
: The EDA Consortium
IEEE-CS\DATC : The IEEE Computer Society
Publisher
European Design and Automation Association  3001 Leuven, Belgium, Belgium
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Today almost all the people in the industry are talking widely about full chip mixed-signal simulation, both in pre-layout and post-layout conditions, basically for two main reasons: a large range of applications is moving from fully digital to mixed-signal and full chip simulation with parasitic components, together with IR drop analysis, is becoming strictly mandatory before going to silicon. In fact, the cost of a mask set for a 90nm or a 65nm technology is growing in an exponential way, passing the million dollar for any single mask set. For these reasons, it is strategic to set up a very complete mixed-signal design flow allowing designers to go to the silicon in a safe way with the minimum risk of failure. Nowadays, various approaches to the same problem are pursued by different organizations, sometimes privileging the fully digital modeling of the mixed-signal system and some other times setting the digital part in VHDL and keeping the analog part at transistor level, simulating the whole chip with a mixed-signal simulator. Which is the right approach? Which are the status and the reliability of the tools on the market? Which is the acceptable trade-off among simulation speed, code coverage and precision of simulation results? This paper tries to answer to these questions proposing a fully qualified and complete mixed-signal flow for SoC verification, implemented to design applications also containing embedded flash memories.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
"Building the Hierarchy from a Flat Netlist for a Fast and Accurate Post-Layout Simulation with Parasitic Components" P. Daglio, D. Iezzi, D. Rimondi, S. Santapa DATE 2004, Paris - February 2004
 
2
"HFC User Manual", Unicad 2.4, Unicad2 documentation February 2005
 
3
"icSim User Manual", Unicad 2.4, Unicad2 documentation, February 2005
 
4
"Virtuoso Layout Editor and Virtuoso XL", Product Version 4.4.6, Cadence Design System, U.S.A.
 
5
"WiCkeD User Manual", Release 3.16, MunEDA GmbH, Munich, Germany
 
6
"Design Kit User Manual", Unicad 2.4, Unicad2 documentation, February 2005