ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Auditing sum-queries to make a statistical database secure
Full text PdfPdf (372 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 9 ,  Issue 1  (February 2006) table of contents
Pages: 31 - 60  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Francesco M. Malvestuto  “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Roma, Italy
Mauro Mezzini  “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Roma, Italy
Marina Moscarini  “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Roma, Italy
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1127345.1127347
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In response to queries asked to a statistical database, the query system should avoid releasing summary statistics that could lead to the disclosure of confidential individual data. Attacks to the security of a statistical database may be direct or indirect and, in order to repel them, the query system should audit queries by controlling the amount of information released by their responses. This paper focuses on sum-queries with a response variable of nonnegative real type and proposes a compact representation of answered sum-queries, called an information model in “normal form,” which allows the query system to decide whether the value of a new sum-query can or cannot be safely answered. If it cannot, then the query system will issue the range of feasible values of the new sum-query consistent with previously answered sum-queries. Both the management of the information model and the answering procedure require solving linear-programming problems and, since standard linear-programming algorithms are not polynomially bounded (despite their good performances in practice), effective procedures that make a parsimonious use of them are stated for the general case. Moreover, in the special case that the information model is “graphical.” It is shown that the answering procedure can be implemented in polynomial time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Ahuja, R. K., Magnanti, T. L., and Orlin, J. B. 1993. Network Flows. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
Chin, F. Y. and Ozsoyoglu, G. 1982. Auditing and inference control in statistical databases. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 8, 574--582.
 
7
Chvátal, V. 1983. Linear Programming. Freeman, New York.
 
8
Cox, L. H. 1980. Suppression methodology and statistical disclosure control. J. American Statistical Association 75, 377--385.
 
9
Cox, L. H. and Zayatz, L. V. 1995. An agenda for research on statistical disclosure limitation. J. Official Statistics 11, 205--220.
 
10
Dobra, A. and Fienberg, S. E. 2000. Bounds for cell entries in contingency tables given the marginal totals and decomposable graphs. In Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11885--11892.
 
11
Duncan, G. T., Fienberg, S. E., Krishnan, R., Padman, R., and Roehrig, S. F. 2001. Disclosure limitation methods and information loss for tabular data. In Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access, P. Doyle, J. Lane, J. Theeuwes, L. Zayatz, Eds. Elsevier, New York, 135--166.
 
12
13
 
14
15
 
16
Malvestuto, F. M. and Mezzini, M. 2001. On the hardness of protecting sensitive information in a statistical database. In Proceedings of the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. XIV. 504--509.
 
17
 
18
 
19
Malvestuto, F. M. and Mezzini, M. 2004. Privacy preserving and data mining in an on-line statistical database of additive type. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Privacy in Statistical Databases, Barcelona.
 
20
 
21
Malvestuto, F. M. and Moscarini, M. 1999. An audit expert for large statistical databases. In Statistical Data Protection, EUROSTAT. 29--43.
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
Willenborg, L. and de Waal, T. 1996. Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 111. Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
27
Willenborg, L. and de Waal, T. 2000. Elements of Statistical Disclosure. Lecture Notes in Statistics, 155. Springer-Verlag, New York.
28


Collaborative Colleagues:
Francesco M. Malvestuto: colleagues
Mauro Mezzini: colleagues
Marina Moscarini: colleagues