Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning

Full text

Pdf (846 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Oxford, England

Pages: 12 - 20

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-399-X

Authors

Donald H. Berman	School of Law, Northeastern University, Boston MA
Carole D. Hafner	College of Computer Science, Northeastern University, Boston MA

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 14, Citation Count: 3

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/112646.112648 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Kevin D. Ashley, Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1988
	2	A~hley, K. 1Oggb. Arguing By Analogy in Law: A Case-B~ Model. In Analogical Reasoning, ed. D. Helman, 205-224. Deventer, NE: Kluwer.
	3	Dukeminier, j. & Krier, J. 1988. Property. Boston: Little Brown.
	4	Hafner C. 1981. An Information Retrieval System Based on a Computer of Legal Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
	5	C. D. Hafner, Conceptual organization of case law knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.35-42, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41740]
	6	Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	7	S. R. Goldman , M. C. Dyer , M. Flowers, Precedent-based legal reasoning and knowledge acquisition in contract law: A process model, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.210-221, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41759]
	8	E. L. Rissland , K. D. Ashley, A case-based system for trade secrets law, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.60-66, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41743]
	9	Wren, C. & Wren, J. 1986. The Legal Research Manual: A game Plan for Legal Research and Analysis. Madison, WI:Abrams & Ambrose.

CITED BY 3

	Donald H. Berman , Carole D. Hafner, Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.42-51, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
	Vincent Aleven, Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment, Artificial Intelligence, v.150 n.1-2, p.183-237, November 2003
	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, What law students need to know to WIN, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.152-161, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands