|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
The book in which Fernando Flores and I introduced our version of the language-action perspective had an ambitious and provocative subtitle: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design [8]. This special section of Communications offers the opportunity to apply the hindsight of nearly two decades to the implicit claim in that phrase, asking how the perspective has been successful as a foundation and promises to be so in the future. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
REVIEW
"Larry Bernstein : Reviewer"
This short muddled exposition clearly does not support the author's claims; he belies his own arguments with his fuzziness. That the language-aspect perspective (LAP) is a foundation for software design is debatable. The author does not support hi
more...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||