I give that web site an 11

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback
Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

I give that web site an 11

Full text

Html (10 KB), Pdf

Pdf (236 KB)

Source

interactions archive
Volume 13 , Issue 3 (May + June 2006) table of contents
A contradiction in terms?

DEPARTMENT: Fresh: pushing the envelope table of contents

Pages: 10 - 11

Year of Publication: 2006

ISSN:1072-5520

Author

Fred Sampson

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125864.1125876 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M., Wright, P., ed. (2004). More Funology. ACM <interactions>. Volume 11, Issue 5, September/October 2004.
	2	B. J. Fogg , Cathy Soohoo , David R. Danielson , Leslie Marable , Julianne Stanford , Ellen R. Tauber, How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, June 06-07, 2003, San Francisco, California [doi>10.1145/997078.997097]
	3	Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.
	4	McCauley, L. (1999). Measure What Matters. Fast Company, May 1999. http://fastcompany.com/magazine/24/one.html
	5	Nielsen, J. (2004). Risks of quantitative studies. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040301.html
	6	Norman, D. (2004) Emotional Design. New York: Basic Books.
	7	Sauro, J. (2004). The risks of discounted qualitative studies. http://www.measuringusability.com/qualitative_risks.htm