ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Detection of video sequences using compact signatures
Full text PdfPdf (726 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 24 ,  Issue 1  (January 2006) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 50  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Justin Zobel  RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Timothy C. Hoad  RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 195,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125857.1125858
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Digital representations are widely used for audiovisual content, enabling the creation of large online repositories of video, allowing access such as video on demand. However, the ease of copying and distribution of digital video makes piracy a growing concern for content owners. We investigate methods for identifying coderivative video content---that is, video clips that are derived from the same original source. By using dynamic programming to identify regions of similarity in video signatures, it is possible to efficiently and accurately identify coderivatives, even when these regions constitute only a small section of the clip being searched. We propose four new methods for producing compact video signatures, based on the way in which the video changes over time. The intuition is that such properties are likely to be preserved even when the video is badly degraded. We demonstrate that these signatures are insensitive to dramatic changes in video bitrate and resolution, two parameters that are often altered when reencoding. In the presence of mild degradations, our methods can accurately identify copies of clips that are as short as 5 s within a dataset 140 min long. These methods are much faster than previously proposed techniques; using a more compact signature, this query can be completed in a few milliseconds.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Adjeroh, D. A., Lee, M. C., and King, I. 1998. A distance measure for video sequence similarity matching. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Multimedia Database Management Systems (Dayton, OH). 72--79.
 
3
Ahanger, G., Benson, D., and Little, T. D. C. 1995. Video query formulation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases (SPIE). 280--291.
 
4
5
 
6
Boreczky, J. S. and Rowe, L. A. 1996. Comparison of video shot boundary detection techniques. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases. 170--179.
7
 
8
Chang, S., Chen, W., Meng, H., Sundaram, H., and Zhong, D. 1998. A fully automated content based video search engine supporting spatio-temporal queries. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Tech. 8, 5, 602--615.
 
9
Cheung, S. and Zakhor, A. 2000. Estimation of web video multiplicity. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Internet Imaging (San Jose, CA).
 
10
DeMenthon, D. 2003. Video retrieval of near-duplicates using k-nearest neighbor retrieval of spatio-temporal descriptors. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI 2003, Rennes, France).
11
 
12
13
 
14
Hampapur, A. and Bolle, R. 2001. Comparison of distance measures for video copy detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.
 
15
Hampapur, A. and Bolle, R. M. 2002. VideoGREP: Video copy detection using inverted file indices. Tech. rep. IBM Exploratory Computer Vision Group, Yorktown Heights, NY.
 
16
Hampapur, A., Bolle, R. M., and Hyun, K.-H. 2001. Comparison of sequence matching techniques for video copy detection. In Proceedings of SPIE: Storage and Retrieval for Media Databases.
17
 
18
Hartung, F., Su, J. K., and Girod, B. 1999. Spread spectrum watermarking: Malicious attacks and counterattacks. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA). 147--158.
19
20
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
Hoi, C.-H. 2002. Similarity measurement and detection of video sequences. Tech. rep. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
 
26
Hoi, C.-H., Wang, W., and Lyu, M. R. 2003. A novel scheme for video similarity detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Image and Video Retrieval. 373--382.
27
28
 
29
Langelaar, G. C., Lagendijk, R. L., and Biemond, J. 1998. Removing spatial spread spectrum watermarks by nonlinear filtering. In Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference. vol. 4. 2281--2284.
 
30
Lee, S.-L., Chun, S.-J., and Lee, J.-H. 2003. Effective similarity search methods for large video data streams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science. 1030--1039.
 
31
Li, D. and Lu, H. 2000. Avoiding false alarms due to illumination variation in shot detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems.
 
32
Lienhart, R. 2001. Reliable transition detection in videos: A survey and practitioner's guide. Int. J. Image Graph. 1, 3, 469--486.
 
33
Lienhart, R., Effelsberg, W., and Jain, R. 1998. VisualGREP: A systematic method to compare and retrieve video sequences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases (SPIE). 271--283.
 
34
 
35
Liu, T., Zhang, X., Wang, D., Feng, J., and Lo, K.-T. 2000. Inertia-based cut detection technique: A step to the integration of video coding and content-based retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing (Beijing, China). Vol. 2. 1018--1025.
36
 
37
Mohan, R. 1998. Video sequence matching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP, Seattle, WA).
 
38
 
39
Naphade, M. R., Mehrotra, R., Ferman, A. M., Warnick, J., Huang, T. S., and Tekalp, A. M. 1998. A high performance shot boundary detection algorithm using multiple cues. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (Chicago, IL).
40
 
41
Naphade, M. R., Yeung, M. M., and Yeo, B.-L. 2000. A novel scheme for fast and efficient video sequence matching using compact signatures. In Proceedings of SPIE, Storage and Retrieval for Media Databases (San Jose, CA). Vol. 3972. 564--572.
 
42
Ng, C. W., King, I., and Lyu, M. R. 2001. Video comparison using tree matching algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Imaging Science, Systems and Technology (Las Vegas, NV). Vol. 1. 184--190.
43
 
44
Park, S., Cho, J.-S., and Hyun, K.-H. 2002. Indexing technique for similarity matching in large video databases. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Media Databases (San Jose, CA). 214--222.
 
45
 
46
Patel, N. V. and Sethi, I. K. 1997. Video shot detection and characterization for video databases. Patt. Recog. 30, 4 (Apr.), 583--592.
 
47
 
48
 
49
Shan, M.-K. and Lee, S.-Y. 1998. Content-based video retrieval based on similarity of frame sequence. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multimedia Database Management Systems (Dayton, OH). 72--79.
 
50
Swanberg, D., Shu, C.-F., and Jain, R. 1993. Knowledge guided parsing in video databases. In Proceedings of the Conference on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology (San Jose, CA).
 
51
Tan, Y. P., Kulkarni, S. R., and Ramadge, P. J. 1999. A framework for measuring video similarity and its application to video query by example. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (Kobe, Japan).
52
53
54
55
56
 
57
 
58
59
 
60
 
61
 
62
Zhao, L., Qi, W., Li, S. Z., Yang, S. Q., and Zhang, H. J. 2001. Content-based retrieval of video shot using the improved nearest feature line method. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (Salt Lake City, UT).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Justin Zobel: colleagues
Timothy C. Hoad: colleagues