Fly: an organic presentation tool

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present Fly, a prototype presentation system that adds a visual structure to presentations. Current presentation software, like PowerPoint, structure slides in a linear sequence. The Fly design introduces a spatial organization that is based on Mind Maps. Using colour associations, spatial relations, and fluid movement, we show how presentation software can structure a meaningful overview of the underlying content.

REFERENCES

• 1: Benjamin B. Bederson , James D. Hollan, Pad++: a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics, Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.17-26, November 02-04, 1994, Marina del Rey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/192426.192435]
• 2: Jacques Bertin, Semiology of graphics, University of Wisconsin Press, 1983
• 3: Buzan, T. The Mind Map Book. Penguin Books, New York, New York, USA, 1991.
• 4: Dillon, A., Richardson, J. and McKnight, C. Space -- the Final Chapter: or Why Physical Representations are not Semantic Intentions. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, and J. Richardson eds. Hypertext: A Psychological Perspective. Ellis Horwood, New York: IEEE, 1999.
• 5: Election Canada On-line. http://www.elections.ca/.
• 6: Lance Good , Benjamin B. Bederson, Zoomable user interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations, Information Visualization, v.1 n.1, p.35-49, March 2002 [doi>10.1057/palgrave/ivs/9500004]
• 7: Kenneth N Lodding, The Hitchhiker's Guide to Biomorphic Software, Queue, v.2 n.4, June 2004 [doi>10.1145/1016978.1016985]
• 8: Yang Li , James A. Landay , Zhiwei Guan , Xiangshi Ren , Guozhong Dai, Sketching informal presentations, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, November 05-07, 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/958432.958476]
• 9: Les Nelson , Satoshi Ichimura , Elin Rønby Pedersen , Lia Adams, Palette: a paper interface for giving presentations, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.354-361, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303109]
• 10: Parker, I. Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts? The New Yorker, 2001.
• 11: PowerPoint Usability. Q&A with Don Norman. http://sociablemedia.com/articles_norman.htm
• 12: Jun Rekimoto , Yuji Ayatsuka , Hitoraka Uoi , Toshifumi Arai, Adding another communication channel to reality: an experience with a chat-augmented conference, CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems, p.271-272, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/286498.286752]
• 13: Anoop K. Sinha , Michael Shilman , Niraj Shah, MultiPoint: a case study of multimodal performance for building presentations, CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, March 31-April 05, 2001, Seattle, Washington [doi>10.1145/634067.634318]
• 14: Tufte, E. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 2003.
• 15: Yarbus, A. L. Eye Movement and Vision. Plenum Press, New York, USA, 1967.
• 16: Douglas E. Zongker , David H. Salesin, On creating animated presentations, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation, July 26-27, 2003, San Diego, California

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

Keywords:
organic interfaces, presentation software