ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The utility of various windowing capabilities for single-task and multi-task environments
Full text PdfPdf (96 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Posters and short talks of the 1992 SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Monterey, California
SESSION: Improving team performance table of contents
Pages: 52 - 52  
Year of Publication: 1992
Authors
Kritina L. Holden  Lockheed Eng. & Sci. Co., Houston, TX
Michael R. O'Neal  Lockheed Eng. & Sci. Co., Houston, TX
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125021.1125070
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Computer systems offering windowing environments have been readily embraced by the computer user community. These capabilities have become so popular in recent years, that even the more traditional command-line systems such as IBM PCs are offering windowing environments. The question arises as to whether or not a windowing environment is appropriate for any and all user environments. This question has particular importance for computer systems that control complex processes and hazardous environments, such as Nuclear Power Plants or Space Station Freedom. Both of these examples represent multitasking environments where there is a large cognitive load on the user. It has been argued that the task of window management poses additional processing loads on the user. In fact, during the early definition of the Space Station Freedom human-computer interface, NASA's astronaut office strongly opposed a windowing environment, partially for "safety" reasons. It was felt that the windowing capabilities were dangerous in an environment where critical information could be accidently hidden, "lost", etc. It was also felt that managing the display of information was an unnecessary additional task.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kritina L. Holden: colleagues
Michael R. O'Neal: colleagues