ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens
Full text PdfPdf (1.38 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Interacting with large surfaces table of contents
Pages: 1263 - 1272  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-372-7
Authors
Hrvoje Benko  Columbia University, New York, NY
Andrew D. Wilson  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Patrick Baudisch  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 66,   Downloads (12 Months): 575,   Citation Count: 30
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124963
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The size of human fingers and the lack of sensing precision can make precise touch screen interactions difficult. We present a set of five techniques, called Dual Finger Selections, which leverage the recent development of multi-touch sensitive displays to help users select very small targets. These techniques facilitate pixel-accurate targeting by adjusting the control-display ratio with a secondary finger while the primary finger controls the movement of the cursor. We also contribute a "clicking" technique, called SimPress, which reduces motion errors during clicking and allows us to simulate a hover state on devices unable to sense proximity. We implemented our techniques on a multi-touch tabletop prototype that offers computer vision-based tracking. In our formal user study, we tested the performance of our three most promising techniques (Stretch, X-Menu, and Slider) against our baseline (Offset), on four target sizes and three input noise levels. All three chosen techniques outperformed the control technique in terms of error rate reduction and were preferred by our participants, with Stretch being the overall performance and preference winner.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
SMART Technologies, http://www.smarttech.com
2
3
 
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
 
17
18
 
19
Olwal, A. and Feiner, S. Rubbing the Fisheye: Precise Touch-Screen Interaction with Gestures and Fisheye Views. Conference Supplement of UIST '03. pp. 83--84.
20
21
22
23
 
24
25
26
27

CITED BY  30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hrvoje Benko: colleagues
Andrew D. Wilson: colleagues
Patrick Baudisch: colleagues