ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool
Full text PdfPdf (5.14 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Beliefs and affect table of contents
Pages: 1163 - 1172  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-372-7
Authors
Katherine Isbister  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Kristina Höök  Swedish Institute for Computer Science
Michael Sharp  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jarmo Laaksolahti  Swedish Institute for Computer Science
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 40,   Downloads (12 Months): 272,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124946
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the development and initial testing of a tool for self-assessment of affect while interacting with computer systems: the Sensual Evaluation Instrument. We discuss our research approach within the context of existing affective and HCI theory, and describe stages of evolution of the tool, and initial testing of its effectiveness.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Clynes, M. 1989. Sentics: The Touch of Emotions. MIT Press.
 
2
Desmet, P.M.A. 2003. Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Blythe, MA, Overbeeke, K, Monk, AF & Wright, PC (Ed.), Funology: from usability to enjoyment. (Human-computer interaction series, 3, pp. 111--123). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
 
3
DiPaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R. 1979. The Structure of Nonverbal Decoding Skills. Journal of Personality 47(3), 506--517.
4
 
5
Ekman, P. 1972. Emotion in the Human face: Guide-lines for Research and an Integration of Findings, Pergammon Press.
 
6
7
8
 
9
Green, W.S. and Jordan, P.M. 2002. Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability. London: Taylor and Francis.
10
 
11
 
12
Johnston, O. and Thomas, F. 1995. The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation, Disney Editions.
 
13
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. 2005. Interational Affective Picture System (IAPS): Digitized Photographs, Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
 
14
LeDoux, J.E. 1996. The Emotional Brain. New York, Simon and Schuster.
 
15
Myers, David G. 2002. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils. Yale University Press.
 
16
Norman, D.A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
 
17
Pashler, H.E. 1998. Central Processing Limitations in Sen-sorimotor Tasks, Pp. 265-317 in The Psychology of Atten-tion, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
18
 
19
Picard, R., and Daily, S.B. 2005. Evaluating affective interactions: Alternatives to asking what users feel. Presented at the 2005 CHI Workshop 'Evaluating Affective Interfaces'.
 
20
Russell, J.A. 1980. A Circumplex Model of Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6), pp. 1161-1178, American Psychological Association.
 
21
Sanders, L. (faculty web page) http://arts.osu.edu/2faculty/a_faculty_profiles/design_fac_profiles/sanders_liz.html.
 
22
Wensveen, S.A.G. 1999. Probing experiences. Proceed-ings of the conference Design and Emotion, November 3 - 5 1999, Delft University of Technology, 23--29
23
 
24
Wong, D., and Baker, C. 1998. Pain in Children: Com-parison of Assessment Scales, Pediatric Nurse 14(1), 9017.

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Katherine Isbister: colleagues
Kristina Höök: colleagues
Michael Sharp: colleagues
Jarmo Laaksolahti: colleagues