ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Clipping lists and change borders: improving multitasking efficiency with peripheral information design
Full text PdfPdf (742 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Visualization 2 table of contents
Pages: 989 - 998  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-372-7
Authors
Tara Matthews  University of California, Berkeley
Mary Czerwinski  Microsoft Research
George Robertson  Microsoft Research
Desney Tan  Microsoft Research
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 107,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124920
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information workers often have to balance many tasks and interruptions. In this work, we explore peripheral display techniques that improve multitasking efficiency by helping users maintain task flow, know when to resume tasks, and more easily reacquire tasks. Specifically, we compare two types of abstraction that provide different task information: semantic content extraction, which displays only the most relevant content in a window, and change detection, which signals when a change has occurred in a window (all de-signed as modifications to Scalable Fabric [17]). Results from our user study suggest that semantic content extraction improves multitasking performance more so than either change detection or our base case of scaling. Results also show that semantic content extraction provides significant benefits to task flow, resumption timing, and reacquisition. We discuss the implication of these findings on the design of peripheral interfaces that support multitasking.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E. "Memory for daily computing events." People and Computers XVI, Proceedings of HCI, 230--245, 2002.
2
 
3
Ellis, J. & Kvavilashvili, L. Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1--9, 2000.
4
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
Lamming, M.G. and Newman, W.M. "Activity-based information retrieval: technology in support of personal memory." Information Processing, 92, 3, 68--81, 1992.
11
 
12
Matthews, T., Rattenbury, T., Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A. "A peripheral display toolkit." U.C. Berkeley Tech Report, CSD-03-1258, 2003.
13
14
15
 
16
17
 
18
Schneiderman, B., Bederson, B.B., "Maintaining concentration to achieve task completion." Proceedings of DUX, To Appear, 2005.
 
19
Sellen, A.J., Louie, G, Harris, J.E. and Wilkins, A.J. "What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory." Memory, 5(4), 483--507, 1996.
20
 
21
Terry, W.S. "Everyday forgetting: data from a diary study." Psychological Reports, 62, 299--303, 1988.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Tara Matthews: colleagues
Mary Czerwinski: colleagues
George Robertson: colleagues
Desney Tan: colleagues