|
ABSTRACT
The internet presents people with an increasingly bewildering variety of choices. Online consumers have to rely on computerized search tools to find the most preferred option in a reasonable amount of time. Recommender systems address this problem by searching for options based on a model of the user's preferences. We consider example critiquing as a methodology for mixed-initiative recommender systems. In this technique, users volunteer their preferences as critiques on examples. It is thus important to stimulate their preference expression by selecting the proper examples, called suggestions. We describe the look-ahead principle for suggestions and describe several suggestion strategies based on it. We compare them in simulations and, for the first time, report a set of user studies which prove their effectiveness in increasing users' decision accuracy by up to 75%.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
R. Burke, K. Hammond and E. Cooper. Knowledge-Based Navigation of Complex Information Spaces. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI press, 1996, pp. 462--468.
|
| |
5
|
R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley, 1976.
|
| |
6
|
Greg Linden, Steve Hanks, and Neal Lesh. Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant. In Proceedings, User Modeling '97, 1997.
|
 |
7
|
Kevin McCarthy , James Reilly , Lorraine McGinty , Barry Smyth, Experiments in dynamic critiquing, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 10-13, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1040830.1040871]
|
| |
8
|
L. McGinty and B. Smyth. On the Role of Diversity in Conversational Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR'03), 2003, pp. 276--290.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
David McSherry. Similarity and Compromise. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 2689, Springer-Verlag, pp. 291--305, 2003
|
| |
11
|
J.W. Payne, J.R. Bettman, and E.J. Johnson. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
|
| |
12
|
B. Price and P.R. Messinger. Optimal Recommendation Sets: Covering Uncertainty over User Preferences. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'05), 2005, pp. 541--548.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
James Reilly, Kevin McCarthy, Lorraine McGinty, and Barry Smyth. Dynamic critiquing. In ECCBR, pages 763--777, 2004.
|
| |
19
|
Hideo Shimazu. Expertclerk: Navigating shoppers buying process with the combination of asking and proposing. In Proceedings of the 17 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'01), volume 2, pages 1443--1448, 2001.
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Barry Smyth and Lorraine McGinty. The power of suggestion. In IJCAI, pages 127--132, 2003.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
A. Tversky, S. Sattath, and P. Slovic. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95:371--384, 1988.
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
|