ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails
Full text PdfPdf (433 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems table of contents
Montréal, Québec, Canada
SESSION: Navigation table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-372-7
Authors
Andy Cockburn  University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Carl Gutwin  University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK, Canada
Jason Alexander  University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 163,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124774
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Scrolling is the standard way to navigate through many types of digital documents. However, moving more than a few pages can be slow because all scrolling techniques constrain visual search to only a small document region. To improve document navigation, we developed Space-Filling Thumbnails (SFT), an overview display that eliminates most scrolling. SFT provides two views: a standard page view for reading, and a thumbnail view that shows all pages. We tested SFT in three experiments that involved finding pages in documents. The first study (n=13) compared seven current scrolling techniques, and showed that SFT is significantly faster than the other methods. The second and third studies (n=32 and n=14) were detailed comparisons of SFT with thumbnail-enhanced scrollbars (TES), which performed well in the first experiment. SFT was faster than TES across all document types and lengths, particularly when tasks involved revisitation. In addition, SFT was strongly preferred by participants.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
5
 
6
Card, S. Mackinlay, JD and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Info. Visualization. Morgan-Kaufmann.
 
7
Cockburn, A. and Greenberg, S. (2000). Issues of Page Representation and Organisation in Web Browser's Revisitation Tools. Aus. J. of Info. Sys, 7 (2), 120--127.
 
8
Cockburn, A. and Savage, J. (2003). Comparing Speed- Dependent Automatic Zooming with Traditional Scroll, Pan and Zoom Methods. Proc. British HCI, 87--102.
9
 
10
Czerwinski, M., van Dantzich, M., Robertson, G. and Hoffman, H. (1999). The Contribution of Thumbnail Image, Mouse-Over Text and Spatial Location Memory to Web Page Retrieval in 3D. Proc.Interact'99, 163--170.
 
11
Egan, D. and Gomez, M. (1985). Assaying, Isolating, and Accommodating Individual Differences in Learning a Complex Skill. in Dillon, R. ed. Individual Differences in Cognition, 173--217.
 
12
Fitts, P. (1954). The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement. J. Experimental Psychology, 47, 381--391.
 
13
Gagnon, D. (1985). Videogames and Spatial Skills: An Exploratory Study. Educational Communication and Technology, 33 (4), 263--275.
 
14
Hart, S. and Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. in Hancock, P.M., ed. Human Mental Workload, 139--183.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
 
27
Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. and Pastoor, S. (1983). A Comparison of Paging and Scrolling for Changing Screen Contents by Inexperienced Users. Human Factors, 25 (3), 279--282.
28
29
30
 
31
Sutherland, I. (1963). Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, 329--346.
32
 
33
34
 
35

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andy Cockburn: colleagues
Carl Gutwin: colleagues
Jason Alexander: colleagues