Multimodal communication in the classroom: what does it mean for us?

ABSTRACT

Experimentation has shown that in-class educational technologies, by permitting anonymous, authored participation, can dramatically alter student communications in the classroom. Now, the appearance of dual pen-and-keyboard computing devices in the university classroom, notably Tablet PCs, motivates thinking critically about how different expressive modalities could improve in-class student problem -solving and communication.This paper describes the use of Ubiquitous Presenter 2.0 in a study to discover the driving issues of multimodality for both in-class technologies and student exercises. This paper sensitizes instructors to the issues of modality and makes specific recommendations for application design. We find that the choice of modality is not merely one of efficiency or naturalness, but is loaded with numerous personal, social, and material considerations. Although use of the pen (over typed text) is generally preferred, we find that choice itself is critical to encouraging student creativity, collaboration, and communication.

REFERENCES

• 1: Matthew Kam , Jingtao Wang , Alastair Iles , Eric Tse , Jane Chiu , Daniel Glaser , Orna Tarshish , John Canny, Livenotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055046]
• 2: Beth Simon , Ruth Anderson , Crystal Hoyer , Jonathan Su, Preliminary experiences with a tablet PC based system to support active learning in computer science courses, Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 28-30, 2004, Leeds, United Kingdom
• 3: Dave Berque , Terri Bonebright , Michael Whitesell, Using pen-based computers across the computer science curriculum, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 4: William G. Griswold , Patricia Shanahan , Steven W. Brown , Robert Boyer , Matt Ratto , R. Benjamin Shapiro , Tan Minh Truong, ActiveCampus: Experiments in Community-Oriented Ubiquitous Computing, Computer, v.37 n.10, p.73-81, October 2004 [doi>10.1109/MC.2004.149]
• 5: Duncan, D., Clickers in the Classroom. Pearson Education, 2005.
• 6: Richard Anderson , Ruth Anderson , Beth Simon , Steven A. Wolfman , Tammy VanDeGrift , Ken Yasuhara, Experiences with a tablet PC based lecture presentation system in computer science courses, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 7: Michelle Wilkerson , William G. Griswold , Beth Simon, Ubiquitous presenter: increasing student access and control in a digital lecturing environment, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 8: Dufresne, R., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., Mestre, J., Wenk, L. Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, v.7, p3--47, 1996.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
active learning, educational technology, modality, tablet PC