A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a description of a course redesign to incorporate active and cooperative learning techniques into an Introduction to Programming course (CS1) in a systematic way that addresses all aspects of the course: delivery, management, and assessment. The primary goals of the experience were to improve student learning in CS1 and help students develop a support system. By increasing their competence and confidence, and helping them establish a working relationship with their peers, we sought to improve their persistence and performance in the program. We thus focus on student performance and retention through the follow-up class (CS2) as taught at Sam Houston State University. The results are encouraging. We observed that 70% of those students that had the Active Learning experience in CS1 end up getting a passing grade in CS2, with only 10% withdrawing (dropping or resigning), in contrast to a 44% passing rate and 25% withdrawal rate among those that took a regular CS1 class.

REFERENCES

• 1: Constructivism in computer science education, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, v.20 n.1, p.45-73, January 2001
• 2: Bloom, B. S., et al. (1994). Excerpts from the "Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive domain." In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 3: Bonwell, C., and J. Eison, "Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom," ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 1, 1991.
• 4: Carroll, J.M. (editor). Minimalism beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
• 5: Chickering, Arthur and Stephen C. Ehrmann, "Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.", AAHE Bulletin, March 1987.
• 6: Felder, Richard M., Felder, Gary N., Dietz, Jacquelin E., "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention" Journal of Engineering Education, volume 98, number 4, 1998, pp. 469--480.
• 7: Gonzalez, Graciela "Constructivism, Group Work and Epistemic Games to Enrich and Introduction to Programming Course", Poster Presentation, ACM SIGCSE Conference, Reno, NV, 2002.
• 8: Gracielo Gonzalez, Constructivism in an introduction to programming course, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.19 n.4, p.299-305, April 2004
• 9: Nira Herrmann , Jeffrey L. Popyack , Bruce Char , Paul Zoski , Christopher D. Cera , Robert N. Lass , Aparna Nanjappa, Redesigning introductory computer programming using multi-level online modules for a mixed audience, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 10: Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and K. Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN, 1991.
• 11: Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K., "Cooperative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity," ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Rept. 4. Washington, D.C. 1991.
• 12: Montgomery, S., and Cohen-Barrett, M., "Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Providing Academic Support," CRLT Occasional Paper No. 8, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan, 1997.
• 13: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2002, NSF 03312
• 14: Gregor M. Novak , Andrew Gavrin , Christian Wolfgang, Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999
• 15: Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates leave the Sciences, Westview, 1997.
• 16: Seymour, E. "'The Problem Iceberg' in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates." Journal of College Science Teaching. February 1992, pp 230--232.
• 17: Sherry, L., Trigg, M. Epistemic forms and epistemic games. Educational Technology, 36(3), 38--44, 1996.
• 18: Springer, L., Stanne, M., and Donovan, S., "Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in SMET: A Meta Analysis," (Monograph No. 11). University of Wisconsin Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
• 19: Computing Curricula 2001 project (CC2001) Final Draft, Computer Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE-CS) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), December 15, 2001.
• 20: Hopkins, Will G, A New View of Statistics, 2004. http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/
• 21: Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Curriculum

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
CS1, CS2, active and cooperative learning, assessment, classroom management, introduction to programming