ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using GALS architecture to reduce the impact of long wire delay on FPGA performance
Full text PdfPdf (493 KB)
Source Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2005 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Poster session IV table of contents
Pages: 1260 - 1263  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-7803-8737-6
Authors
Xin Jia  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Ranga Vemuri  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
: Shanghai IC Industry Association
: IEEE SSCS Shanghai Chapter
: IEEE CAS
: IEEE Beijing Section
: Fudan University
: Chinese Institute of Electronics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120725.1121038
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Interconnect delay is becoming a major roadblock to FPGA performance with technology scaling and growing chip sizes. Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous (GALS) design is considered a potential solution to this issue. An important design decision in building a GALS FPGA architecture is to determine the appropriate GALS island size. A large GALS island will reduce the asynchronous communication overhead but the interconnect delay inside an island is increased. On the other hand, asynchronous communication overhead could be a major concern for a small GALS island size. In this paper, we propose a design flow to investigate this tradeoff. The input circuit is first divided into partitions according to the specified GALS island size and each partition is then implemented with commercially available CAD tools. The overall system performance is estimated by a performance evaluator. Experimental results validate our design flow and show a performance improvement of around 20% by adopting a GALS architecture.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Xilinx Incorporation. "Virtex-II Platform FPGAs: Complete Data Sheet," June. 04, 2004.
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
Andrew Royal, Peter Cheung, "Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous FPGA Architectures," In Proceedings of 13th International Workshop on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2003.
 
11
Xin Jia, Jayanthi Rajagopalan, Ranga Vemuri, "A Dynamic Reconfigurable Asynchronous FPGA Architecture" 14th International Workshop on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2004 (to be appeared).
12
 
13
Synopsys Inc. "Design Compiler User Guide," June 2003.
 
14
Xilinx Inc., "Xilinx/Synopsys Interface Guide," 2002.
 
15
Xilinx Inc., "Development System Reference Guide -- ISE 5," 2002.
 
16
J Jeon, et al, http://poppy.snu.ac.kr/CDFG/cdfg.html.
 
17
J Miller, H Kramer, "Analysis of Multi-Process Specifications with a Petri-Net Model," In Proceedings of European Design Automation Conference with EURO- VHDL'93, 1993.
 
18