ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On fuzziness in relationship value segmentation: applications to personalized e-commerce
Full text PdfPdf (129 KB)
Source ACM SIGecom Exchanges archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 2  (June 2003) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2003
Authors
Miguel-Ángel Sicilia  Computer Science Department, Carlos III University, Avda. Universidad, Leganés, Madrid, Spain
Elena García  Computer Science Department, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Barcelona, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120709.1120712
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Relationship marketing strategies focus on the construction and maintenance of tailored relationship with customers. Consequently, electronic commerce systems following the relationship approach may benefit from Web personalization techniques in tailoring the interaction with its users according to an evolving customer model. In this context, relationship-value market segmentation becomes a central customer modeling activity. But value segmentation categories are inherently vague due to the use of imprecise linguistic categories, combined with a degree of uncertainty about customer behavior, and the difficulty inherent to estimating intangible variables. In this paper, a fuzzy approach to value segmentation is described, allowing more flexible customer segments. Fuzzy models of value estimations are represented by fuzzy triangular numbers, and two segmentation approaches, directed and discovery-oriented are briefly described. The usefulness of the approach is then illustrated through concrete personalization techniques based on those fuzzy categories.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
{1} ABDEL-KADER, M. AND DUGDALE, D. 2001. Evaluating Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy Set Theory Approach. British Accounting Review 33, 455-489.
 
2
{2} BERRY, L.L. 1983. Relationship marketing. In: Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L., Upah, D. (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, USA, 25-28.
 
3
{3} BILGIÇ, T., AND TÜRKSEN, T. 1999. Measurement of Membership Functions: Theoretical and Empirical Work. In: D. Dubois and H. Prade (eds.) Handbook of Fuzzy Sets and Systems Vol. 1, Chapter 3, Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, Kluwer, 195-232.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
{7} DE LUCA, A., TERMINI, S. 1972. A Definition of Non-probabilistic Entropy in The Setting of Fuzzy Sets Theory. Information & Control, 20, 301-312.
 
8
 
9
{9} FRANK, R.E., MASSY, W.F. AND WIND, Y. 1972. Market Segmentation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
 
10
{10} HAKANSSON H. (ed.). 1982. International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods. An Interaction Approach. New York, Wiley.
 
11
{11} HOGAN, J.E. 2001. Expected Relationship Value: A Construct, a Methodology for Measurement, and a Modeling Technique, Industrial Marketing Management, 30(4), 339-351.
 
12
{12} HSU, T.H., CHU, K.M., CHAN, H.C. 2000. The fuzzy clustering on market segment. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2, 621-626.
 
13
 
14
 
15
{15} LAARHOVEN, P. AND PEDRYCZ, W. 1983. A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11(3), 229-241.
 
16
 
17
{17} OZER, M. 2001. User segmentation of online music services using fuzzy clustering, Omega, 29(2), 193-206.
 
18
{18} PETROF, J.V. 1998. Relationship marketing--the emperor in used clothes, Business Horizons, 41(2), 79-82.
19
 
20
{20} ROSCH, E. 1978. Principles of Categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd, editors, Cognition and Categorization, 27-48. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
 
21
{21} RYALS, L. 2002. Are your customers worth more than money? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9, 241-251.
22
 
23
{23} SHETH, J.N., AND PARVATIYAR, A. 2000. Handbook of Relationship Marketing. Sage Publications, Inc.
 
24
 
25
{25} SICILIA, M. A., GARCÍA, E., AEDO, I. Y DÍAZ, P. 2003. Using Links to Describe Imprecise Relationships in Educational Contents. International Journal for Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning. Special Issue on Concepts and Ontologies in Web-Based Educational Systems. Inderscience (in press).
 
26
{26} SMETS, P. 1997. Imperfect information : Imprecision - Uncertainty. In: Uncertainty Management in Information Systems. From Needs to Solutions. A. Motro and Ph. Smets (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 225-254.
 
27
{27} SMITH, W. 1956. Product Differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21, 3-8.
 
28
 
29
{29} WEDEL, M., AND KAMAKURA, W.A. 1999. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2nd edition.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Miguel-Ángel Sicilia: colleagues
Elena García: colleagues