A multi-party contract model

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A multi-party contract model

Full text

Pdf (262 KB)

Source

ACM SIGecom Exchanges archive
Volume 5 , Issue 1 (July 2004) table of contents

Pages: 13 - 23

Year of Publication: 2004

Author

Lai Xu

Department of Computer Science, Free University, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 33, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120694.1120697 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Contracts between multiple business parties play an increasingly important role in the global economy where activities along the value chain are executed by independent, yet co-operating, companies. Information technology to enact a value chain is now being deployed in the form of ERP systems, workflow systems, web services and e-marketplaces. However, there is little known on how to formally model a multi-party contract. In this paper, we investigate how to model a multi-party contract in a manner convenient for detecting the parties responsible for contract violations.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Alan Abrahams , David Eyers , Jean Bacon, An asynchronous rule-based approach for business process automation using obligations, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Rule-based programming, p.93-103, October 05, 2002, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/570186.570195]
	2	Philip R. Cohen , Hector J. Levesque, Communicative actions for artificial agents, Software agents, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997
	3	A. Dan , D. M. Dias , R. Kearney , T. C. Lau , T. N. Nguyen , F. N. Parr , M. W. Sachs , H. H. Shaikh, Business-to-business integration with tpaML and a business-to-business protocol framework, IBM Systems Journal, v.40 n.1, p.68-90, January 2001
	4	DASKALOPULU, A., T, T. D., AND MAIBAUM, T. 2002. Evidence-based electronic contract performance monitoring. INFORMS Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation Special Issue: formal Modeling of Electronic Commerce.
	5	DUBRAY, J.-J. 2002. A new model for ebxml bpss multi-party collaborations and web services choreography. http://www.ebpml.org/ebpml.doc.
	6	GROSOF, B. AND POON, T. 2003. Sweetdeal: representing agent contracts with exceptions using xml rules, ontologies, and process descriptions.
	7	HAUGEN, B. 2002. Multi-party electronic business transactions. http://www.supplychainlinks. com/MultiPartyBusinessTransactions.PDF.
	8	Eleanna Kafeza , Dickson K. W. Chiu , Irene Kafeza, View-Based Contracts in an E-Service Cross-Organizational Workflow Environment, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Technologies for E-Services, p.74-88, September 14-15, 2001
	9	Steven O. Kimbrough , Scott A. Moore, On automated message processing in electronic commerce and work support systems: speech act theory and expressive felicity, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.15 n.4, p.321-367, Oct. 1997 [doi>10.1145/263479.263480]
	10	KOETSIER, M., GREFEN, P., AND VONK. 1999. Contract model. Tech. Rep. Deliverable D4b, Cross-Organisational/Workflow, Crossflow ESPRITE/28635.
	11	LEE, R. 1998. Towards open electronic contracting. Electronic Markets 8, 3 (Mar.).
	12	MOORE, S. 2000. Kqml and flbc: Contrasting agent communication languages. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5, 1.
	13	Timothy J. Norman , Carles Sierra , Nick R. Jennings, Rights and Commitment in Multi-Agent Agreements, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, p.222, July 03-07, 1998
	14	PROJECT, C. 1999. Insurance requirements. Tech. Rep. CrossFlow deliverable: D1.b, CrossFlow consortium.
	15	Rich Ervin, Chains of commitment software architecture, ACM SIGecom Exchanges, v.3 n.1, p.1-12, Winter, 2002 [doi>10.1145/844331.844333]
	16	TAN, Y.-H. AND THOEN, W. 1999. A logical model of directed obligations and permissions to support electronic contracting in electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 3, 2, 87-104.
	17	Mahadevan Venkatraman , Munindar P. Singh, Verifying Compliance with Commitment Protocols, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, v.2 n.3, p.217-236, September 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1010056221226]
	18	Mario Verdicchio , Marco Colombetti, Commitments for agent-based supply chain management, ACM SIGecom Exchanges, v.3 n.1, p.13-23, Winter, 2002 [doi>10.1145/844331.844334]
	19	Hans Weigand , Egon Verharen , Frank Dignum, Dynamic business models as a basis for interoperable transaction design, Information Systems, v.22 n.2-3, p.139-154, April/May 1997 [doi>10.1016/S0306-4379(97)00010-0]
	20	Hans Weigand , Lai Xu, Contracts in E-Commerce, Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG2.6 Ninth Working Conference on Database Semantics: Semantic Issues in E-Commerce Systems, p.3-17, April 25-28, 2001
	21	XU, L. 2003. Monitorable electronic contract. In The 2003 IEEE Conference on E-Commerce (CEC'03). IEEE Computer Society Press.
	22	XU, L. 2004a. Appendix: all actions and commitments of a car insurance case. http://www.cs. vu.nl/~xu/appendix.pdf.
	23	XU, L. 2004b. Monitoring multi-party contracts for e-business. Ph.D. thesis, Tilburg University.
	24	XU, L. AND JEUSFELD, M. A. 2003. Pro-active monitoring of electronic contracts. In The 15th Conference On Advanced Information Systems Engineering in Lecture Notes of Computer Science. Vol. 2681. Springer-Verlag, 584-600.