Window navigation with and without animation

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Window navigation with and without animation: a comparison of scroll bars, zoom, and fisheye view

Full text

Pdf (211 KB)

Source

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems: looking to the future table of contents

Atlanta, Georgia

SESSION: Late-breaking/short talks table of contents

Pages: 279 - 280

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-926-2

Authors

Misha Donskoy	Donskoy Interactive Software Company, Moscow, Russia
Victor Kaptelinin	Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Sponsor

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 5

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120212.1120393 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Each of three window navigation techniques --- scroll bars, zoom, and fisheye view --- were implemented in two versions: with animation (a gradual transition from one state to another was provided) and without animation. A highly significant effect of navigation technique, but not of animation, was found in the experiment reported in the paper.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Baecker, R., Small, I. (1990). Animation at the interface. In: B. Laurel (Ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley.
	2	Beard, D., Walker, J. Q. (1990) Navigational techniques to improve the display of large two-dimensional spaces. Beh. Inf. Techn., 9 (6).
	3	Cleotilde Gonzalez, Does animation in user interfaces improve decision making?, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.27-34, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/238386.238396]
	4	Victor Kaptelinin, A comparison of four navigation techniques in a 2D browsing task, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.282-283, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223675]

CITED BY 5

	Benjamin B. Bederson, Fisheye menus, Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.217-225, November 06-08, 2000, San Diego, California, United States
	Bruce H. Thomas , Paul Calder, Applying cartoon animation techniques to graphical user interfaces, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.8 n.3, p.198-222, September 2001
	Benjamin B. Bederson , Angela Boltman, Does Animation Help Users Build Mental Maps of Spatial Information?, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, p.28, October 24-29, 1999
	Lance Good , Benjamin B. Bederson, Zoomable user interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations, Information Visualization, v.1 n.1, p.35-49, March 2002
	Andy Cockburn , Amy Karlson , Benjamin B. Bederson, A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.41 n.1, p.1-31, December 2008

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
animation, fisheye view, scroll bars, window navigation, zoom

Collaborative Colleagues:

Misha Donskoy: colleagues

Victor Kaptelinin: colleagues

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player