ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Testing for power usability
Full text PdfPdf (99 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems: looking to the future table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia
SESSION: Workshops table of contents
Pages: 235 - 235  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-926-2
Authors
Keith S. Kara  Xerox Corporation, Rochester, NY
Thomas J. Perry  Xerox Corporation, Rochester, NY
Marc J. Krolczyk  Xerox Corporation, Rochester, NY
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120212.1120366
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Usability studies are usually conducted in a compressed time scale (measured in hours) compared with a user's eventual experience with a product (often measured in years). For this reason, typical usability evaluations focus on success during initial interactions with a product (sea for example Dumas & Redish, 1994 and Nielsen & Mack, 1994). Success on initial use is often driven by familiarity. Are what we call "intuitive" user interfaces really just familiar user interfaces? This "familiarity effect" can often swamp the usability differences between design alternatives. If usability evaluations continue to emphasize initial success with a product we may inhibit innovation in user interface design. There is a tension between initial usability (measured by success at first encounter) and efficiency of skilled performance. Initial learning of a product's user interface often results in quite rapid increases in efficiency of use. A narrow focus on initial usability elevates learnability above efficiency once "up the learning curve". While this approach is appropriate for some products targeted primarily for casual / occasional users, it fails to capture the usability issues associated with power users (those with significant experience, training, or a professional orientation to their interaction with the product).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Neilson, J., Mack, R. (1994) Usability Inspection Methods. NY: John Wiley & Son.
 
3
Usability Sciences Corporation (1994) Windows 3.1 and Windows 95 Quantification of Learning Time and Productivity. (available from http://www.microsoft.com/windows/product/usability.htm)


Collaborative Colleagues:
Keith S. Kara: colleagues
Thomas J. Perry: colleagues
Marc J. Krolczyk: colleagues