ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards
Full text PdfPdf (844 KB)
Source ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 4  (December 2005) table of contents
Pages: 277 - 315  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0360-0300
Authors
Marco Eichelberg  Oldenburger Forschungs- und Entwicklungsinstitut für Informatik-Werkzeuge und -Systeme (OFFIS), Oldenburg, Germany
Thomas Aden  Oldenburger Forschungs- und Entwicklungsinstitut für Informatik-Werkzeuge und -Systeme (OFFIS), Oldenburg, Germany
Jörg Riesmeier  Oldenburger Forschungs- und Entwicklungsinstitut für Informatik-Werkzeuge und -Systeme (OFFIS), Oldenburg, Germany
Asuman Dogac  Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey
Gokce B. Laleci  Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 126,   Downloads (12 Months): 935,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1118890.1118891
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Medical information systems today store clinical information about patients in all kinds of proprietary formats. To address the resulting interoperability problems, several Electronic Healthcare Record standards that structure the clinical content for the purpose of exchange are currently under development. In this article, we present a survey of the most relevant Electronic Healthcare Record standards, examine the level of interoperability they provide, and assess their functionality in terms of content structure, access services, multimedia support, and security. We further investigate the complementarity of the standards and assess their market relevance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aden, T. and Eichelberg, M. 2005. Cross-enterprise search and access to clinical information based on IHE Retrieve Information for Display. In Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS'05). Elsevier, 986--991.
 
2
Aden, T., Eichelberg, M., and Thoben, W. 2004. A fault-tolerant cryptographic protocol for patient record requests. In Proceedings of EuroPACS-MIR 2004 in the Enlarged Europe. EuroPACS, 103--106.
 
3
ANSI. American National Standards Institute. http://www.ansi.org/.
 
4
 
5
ARTEMIS. The ARTEMIS Project. http://www.srdc.metu.edu.tr/webpage/projects/artemis.
 
6
Beale, T. 2002. Archetypes: Constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. In Workshop on Behavioural Semantics (OOPSLA'02). http://www.deepthought.com.au/it/archetypes/arche-types_new.pdf.
 
7
Beale, T. 2005. The openEHR integration information model, rev. 0.5. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
8
Beale, T. and Heard, S. Archetype definitions and principles. http://www.openehr.org/repositories/spec-dev/latest/publishing/architecture/archety-pes/principles/REV_HIST.html.
 
9
Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2003. The openEHR EHR service model, rev. 0.2. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
10
Beale, T. and Heard, S. 2005. Archetype Definition Language (ADL), Rev. 2.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). The openEHR Foundation. openEHR Specification.
 
11
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2004. The openEHR EHR_EXTRACT information model, Rev. 1.3.5. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
12
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005a. The openEHR common information model Rev. 2.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
13
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005b. The openEHR data types information model Rev. 1.9.1. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
14
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005c. The openEHR demographic information model, Rev. 1.4.7. openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
15
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005d. The openEHR EHR information model Rev. 5.0rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
16
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005e. The openEHR support information model Rev. 1.5rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
17
Beale, T., Heard, S., Kalra, D., and Lloyd, D. 2005f. The openEHR data structures information model Rev. 1.6rc1 (Release 1.0 draft). openEHR Reference Model. The openEHR Foundation.
 
18
Bicer, V., Kilic, O., Dogac, A., and Laleci, G. B. 2005. Archetype-based semantic interoperability of Web service messages in the healthcare domain. Inte. J. Semantic Web Informat. Syst. 1, 4, 1--23.
19
 
20
Bicer, V., Laleci, G. B., Dogac, A., and Kabak, Y. 2005b. Providing semantic interoperability in the healthcare domain through ontology mapping. In Proceedings of eChallenges 2005. Ljubljana, Slovenia.
 
21
Boniface, M. and Wilken, P. 2005. ARTEMIS: Towards a secure interoperability infrastructure for healthcare information systems. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics---From Grid to Healthgrid: Proceedings of Healthgrid 2005. T. Solomonides, R. McClatchey, V. Breton, Y. Legré, and S. Nørager, Eds. Vol. 112. IOS Press, 181--189.
 
22
Brown, N. and Reynolds, M. 2000. Strategy for production and maintenance of standards for interoperability within and between service departments and other healthcare domains. Short Strategic Study CEN/TC 251/N00-047, CEN/TC 251 Health Informatics. Brussels, Belgium.
 
23
Canada Health Infoway. http://www.canadahealthinfoway.com/.
 
24
CBC Archetype. Complete blood count archetype ADL definition. http://www.openehr.org/repositories/archetype-dev/adl_1.1/adl/archety-pes/openehr/ehr/entry/openehr-ehr-observation.haematology-cbc.draft.adl.html.
 
25
CEN ENV 12265. 1997. Medical informatics--Electronic healthcare record architecture. European Prestandard ENV 12265, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
 
26
CEN ENV 13606. 2000. Medical informatics---Electronic healthcare record communication. European Prestandard ENV 13606, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
 
27
CEN prEN 13606-1. 2004. Health informatics--Electronic health record communication--Part 1: Reference model. Draft European Standard for CEN Enquiry prEN 13606-1, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
 
28
CEN prEN 14822-1. 2003. General purpose information components. Draft European Standard prEN 14822-1, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
 
29
CEN TS 14796. 2003. Health informatics---Data types. Technical Specification TS 14796, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
 
30
CEN/TC 251. European Committee for Standardization---Technical Committee on Health Informatics. http://www.centc251.org/.
 
31
Channin, D. S., Siegel, E. L., Carr, C., Sensmeier, J., Henderson, M., Behlen, F. M., Parisot, C., and Siegel, E. L. 2001. Integrating the healthcare enterprise: A primer. Part 4--5. Radiographics 21, 6 (Nov--Dec), 1597--1608.
 
32
Channin, D. S., Siegel, E. L., Parisot, C., Wanchoo, V., and Leontiev, A. 2001. Integrating the healthcare enterprise: A primer. Part 1--3. Radiographics 21, 5 (Sept--Oct), 1339--1358.
 
33
Clunie, D. A. 2000. DICOM Structured Reporting, 1st ED. PixelMed Publishing, Bangor PA.
 
34
DICOM. 2004. Digital imaging and communications in medicine. NEMA Standards Publication PS 3. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn VA.
 
35
DICOM Supplement 104 2005. DICOM encapsulation of PDF documents. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 6, Final Text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup104_ft.pdf.
 
36
DICOM Supplement 42 2004. MPEG2 transfer syntax. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 13. Visible light, final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup42_ft. pdf.
 
37
DICOM Supplement 85 2004. Web access to DICOM persistent objects (WADO). Joint DICOM Standards Committee/ISO TC215 Ad Hoc Working Group on WADO. Final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup85_ft. pdf.
 
38
DICOM Supplement 99 2005. Extended negotiation of user identity. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 14. Final text. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup99_ft. pdf.
 
39
Dierks, T. and Allen, C. 1999. The TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocol. IETF Specification RFC 2246. Internet Engineering Task Force. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt.
 
40
Dogac, A., Laleci, G., Kirbas, S., Kabak, Y., Sinir, S., Yildiz, A., and Gurcan, Y. 2005. Artemis: deploying semantically enriched web services in the healthcare domain. Informat. Syst. J. (Special Issue on Semantic Web and Web Services). To appear.
 
41
Dogac, A., Laleci, G. B., Kabak, Y., Unal, S., Beale, T., Heard, S., Elkin, P., Najmi, F., Mattocks, C., and Webber, D. 2004. Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. Int. J. Metadata, Semantics Ontologies. To appear.
 
42
ebRIM. ebXML Registry Information Model v2.5. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.5/specs/ebrim-2.5.pdf.
 
43
ebRS. ebXML Registry Services Specification v2.5. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.5/specs/ebrs-2.5.pdf.
 
44
Eichelberg, M., Poiseau, E., B.Wein, B., and Riesmeier, J. 2003. IHE Europe: extending the IHE initiative to the European healthcare market. In Medical Imaging 2003: PACS and Integrated Medical Information Systems: Design and Evaluation. H. K. Huang and O. M. Ratib, EDS. Vol. 5033. SPIE, 1--10.
 
45
freebXML. (OMAR) implementation. http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/index.html.
 
46
 
47
HIMSS. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. http://www.himss.org/.
 
48
HL7. Health Level 7 (HL7). http://www.hl7.org/.
 
49
HL7 2.5 2000. HL7, Application Protocol for Electronic Data Exchange in Healthcare Environments, Version 2.5, ANSI Standard. Ann Arbor MI.
 
50
HL7 CCOW. Clinical context object workgroup standard. http://www.hl7.org.au/CCOW.htm.
 
51
HL7 CDA Implementations. HL7 Clinical document architecture implementations. http://www.hl7.org.au/CDA.htm.
 
52
HL7 CDA Release 1.0 2000. The HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Data Architecture. Release 1.0. ANSI Standard.
 
53
HL7 CDA Release 2.0 2005. The HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Data Architecture. Release 2.0. ANSI Standard.
 
54
HL7 RIM. HL7 reference information model. http://www.hl7.org/library/data-model/RIM/modelpage_non.htm.
 
55
HL7 V3. HL7 version 3 message development framework. http://www.hl7.org/library/mdf99/mdf99.pdf.
 
56
Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schröter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. 2004a. DICOM structured reporting: Part 1. Overview and characteristics. Radiographics 24, 3 (May--June), 891--96.
 
57
Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schröter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. 2004b. DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics 24, 3 (May--June), 897--909.
 
58
Iakovidis, I. 1998. Towards personal health records: Current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of Electronic Healthcare Records in Europe. Int. J. Medical Informatics 52, 128, 105--117.
 
59
IHE. Integrating the healthcare enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/.
 
60
IHE. 2005a. Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I). IHE Radiology Technical Framework, Supplement 2005--2006. Trial Implementation, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RAD-TF_Suppl_XDSI_TI_2005-08-15.pdf.
 
61
IHE. 2005b. Cross-Enterprise user authentication (XUA) integration profile. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, Supplement 2005--2006. Public Comment II Version, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF-Supplement_Cross-Ent_User_Authentication_PC-2_2005-07-28.pdf.
 
62
IHE. 2005c. Document digital signature content profile. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, Supplement 2005-2006. Trial Implementation, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF-Supplement_Digital_Signature-TI_2005-08-15.pdf.
 
63
IHE. 2005d. IT infrastructure technical framework Rev. 2.0. Tech. rep., Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm.
 
64
ISO 17432. 2004. Health Informatics---Messages and Communication---Web Access to DICOM Persistent Objects. International Standard IS 17432, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
 
65
ISO/TR 18307. 2001. Health informatics---Interoperability and compatibility in messaging and communication standards---Key characteristics. Tech. rep. TR 18307. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
 
66
ISO/TR 20514. 2005. Health informatics---Electronic health record---Definition, scope and context. Tech. rep. TR 20514. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
 
67
ISO/TS 18308. 2004. Health informatics---Requirements for an electronic health record architecture. Tech. speci. TS 18308. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
 
68
Kalra, D. 2004. CEN prEN 13606, draft standard for Electronic Health Record Communication and its introduction to ISO TC/215. Document CEN/TC 251/WG I/N04-52, CEN/TC 251. Health Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.
 
69
Kerberos. Kerberos: The network authentication protocol. http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/.
 
70
Klein, G. and Beeler, G. 2000. Memorandum of understanding on Intensifying the collaboration between CEN/TC 251 and HL7. Document CEN/TC 251/N00-022, CEN/TC 251. Health Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.
 
71
LOINC. Logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC). http://www.loinc.org/.
 
72
MML 2003. Medical Markup Language (MML) Specification Version 3.0. MedXML Consortium. http://www.medxml.net/E_mml30/.
 
73
NAICS. North American Industrial Classification Scheme (NAICS) Codes. http://www.naics.com/.
 
74
NEMA. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). http://www.nema.org/.
 
75
OpenEHR. openEHR Community. http://www.openehr.org/.
 
76
OpenGALEN. OpenGALEN Foundation. http://www.opengalen.org/.
 
77
RSNA. Radiological Society of North America. http://www.rsna.org/.
 
78
SAML 2005. Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0. Tech. Overview, Working Draft 06. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12938/sstc-saml-tech-overview-2.0-draft-06.pdf.
 
79
SAML Profiles 2005. Profiles for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Version 2.0. OASIS Standard. http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-profiles-2.0-os.pdf.
 
80
SNOMED. SNOMED (The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine) Clinical Terms. http://www.snomed.org/snomedct_txt.html.
 
81
Trombert-Paviot, B., Rodrigues, J. M., Rogers, J. E., Baud, R., van der Haring, E., Rassinoux, A. M., Abrial, V., Clavel, L., and Idir, H. 2000. GALEN: A third generation terminology tool to support a multipurpose national coding system for surgical procedures. Int. J. Medical Informatics 58--59, 71--85.
 
82
UNSPSC. Universal Standard Products and Services Classification (UNSPSC). http://eccma.org/unspsc.
 
83
WSDL. Web Service Description Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Marco Eichelberg: colleagues
Thomas Aden: colleagues
Jörg Riesmeier: colleagues
Asuman Dogac: colleagues
Gokce B. Laleci: colleagues