ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Statistical leakage minimization through joint selection of gate sizes, gate lengths and threshold voltage
Full text PdfPdf (503 KB)
Source Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2006 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference table of contents
Yokohama, Japan
SESSION: Statistical design table of contents
Pages: 953 - 958  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:0-7803-9451-8
Authors
Sarvesh Bhardwaj  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Yu Cao  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Sarma Vrudhula  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEICE ESS : Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
IPSJ SIG-SLDM : Information Processing Society of Japan, SIG System LSI Design Methodology
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1118299.1118513
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a novel methodology for statistical leakage minimization of digital circuits. A function of mean and variance of the circuit leakage is minimized with constraint on α-percentile of the delay using physical delay models. Since the leakage is a strong function of the threshold voltage and gate length, considering them as design variables can provide significant amount of power savings. The leakage minimization problem is formulated as a multivariable convex optimization problem. We demonstrate that statistical optimization can lead to more than 37% savings in nominal leakage compared to worst-case techniques that perform only gate sizing.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
International technology roadmap for semiconductors. 2003.
2
 
3
D. Boning and S. Nassif. Models of process variations in device and interconnect, Design of High-Performance Microprocessor Circuits, chapter 6. IEEE Press, 2000.
4
 
5
K. A. Bowman, S. G. Duvall, and J. D. Meindl. Impact of die-to-die and within-die parameter fluctuations on the maximum clock frequency distribution for gigascale integration. JSSC, 37(2):183--190, Feb 2002.
 
6
S. Boyd, S. J. Kim, L. Vandenberghe, and A. Hassibi. A tutorial on geometric programming. Technical report, www.stanford.edu/~boyd/gp_tutorial.html, 2004.
7
 
8
A. R. Conn, N. I. M. Gould, and P. L. Toint. LANCELOT. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
9
10
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
S. Narendra et al. Full-chip subthreshold leakage power prediction and reduction techniques for sub-0.18-μ/m CMOS. Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 39(2):501--510, Feb 2004.
16
 
17
 
18
M. J. M. Pelgrom, A. C. J. Duinmaijer, and A. P. G. Welbers. Matching properties of mos transistors. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 24(5):1433--1439, Oct 1989.
19
20
21
22
23
 
24
J. Tschanz et al. Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37(11):1396--1402, 2002.
 
25
UC Berkeley Device Group. BSIM 4.2.1 MOSFET Model - User's Manual, 2004.
 
26
P. M. Vaidya. A new algorithm for minimizing convex functions over convex sets. In 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1989.
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sarvesh Bhardwaj: colleagues
Yu Cao: colleagues
Sarma Vrudhula: colleagues