| Green: a pedagogically customizable round-tripping UML class diagram Eclipse plug-in |
| Full text |
Pdf
(292 KB)
|
| Source
|
OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange
archive
Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchange
table of contents
San Diego, California
Pages: 115 - 119
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-342-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 23, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
UML class diagrams are used quite commonly in CS1-CS2 courses and textbooks. The benefits of using these diagrams include providing a programming-language independent way of communicating program design, in an industry standard language. While drawing diagrams by hand is in itself useful, beginning students do not always perceive the benefit of designing before coding, and create these diagrams only if they have to, and then only as an afterthought.We have found that students are much more receptive to using UML class diagrams as an integral part of their development if they see immediate benefits from doing so. This paper describes Green, a simple to use yet flexible and extensible UML class diagramming tool. Green (an Eclipse plug-in) provides complete round-tripping between code and class diagram. This capability makes it easy for students to alternate between a detailed code-level view and a more abstract design view of their projects. With this capability students see creating class diagrams not as a separate and tedious activity, but as an easy way to turn designs into code and to discover the design of existing code.Green's distinguishing features when compared to similar tools are that it has been developed to meet the needs of CS1-CS2 students, the semantics of its relationships are customizable, additional class relationships can be defined and it is integrated with Eclipse, a mature development environment.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Computing curricula 2001. Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 1(3es):1, 2001.
|
| |
2
|
Unified Modeling Language Specification. Object Management Group, 2003.
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Carl Alphonce , Phil Ventura, Using graphics to support the teaching of fundamental object-oriented principles in CS1, Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 26-30, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/949344.949391]
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Stephen H. Edwards, Rethinking computer science education from a test-first perspective, Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 26-30, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/949344.949390]
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Kathryn E. Gray , Matthew Flatt, ProfessorJ: a gradual introduction to Java through language levels, Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 26-30, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/949344.949394]
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
James I. Hsia , Elspeth Simpson , Daniel Smith , Robert Cartwright, Taming Java for the classroom, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
 |
12
|
Nachiappan Nagappan , Laurie Williams , Miriam Ferzli , Eric Wiebe , Kai Yang , Carol Miller , Suzanne Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
|
 |
13
|
|
|